Milkman’s Son: A letter to Karlheinz Schreiber

 

Note: While some individuals named herein are now deceased, the facts reduced herein should never have been ignore by a police force such as The Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

 

Dear Karlheinz.

 

Adnan Kashoogi once corrected me, when I asked him how he felt about being referred to as an arms dealer, he said, “if people call you an arms dealer, they mean murderer, but I don’t feel like a criminal.”…

 

I had to ask:” you mean that you don’t feel like a murderer?”

 

He was annoyed, he took a sip of that $10 water-that I paid for, and then  remarked that perhaps I should be arrested, for providing him a glass of water … 

 

He wasn’t done, I was to be bombarded with principles of Cognitive Dissonance…

 

You know, he said, how many people are killed each year by water or the lack of it?

Do you think that people would stop fighting if there were no guns? 

Do you accuse your priest- you’re Catholic right?, why his church spreads beliefs that inevitably lead to wars? 

Do you condemn the Catholic church for killing tens of thousands of native children in this country? – Although this conversation took place in 1992, somehow, he seemed to be aware of the circumstances…

Do you call them “Faith Dealers” as if you meant that they, like me are implied criminals?

 

Suddenly he seemed amused by his logic, or maybe it was by the look on my face.

 

He would continue,” there is no Santa Claus, so are your parents criminals for letting you believe in such ridiculous charade?”

 

He would conclude that he wanted to have this conversation for a long time. He wanted to liberate, extract that innocence from someone, but everyone he knew are mostly Muslims, and much more unsophisticated when it came to believing in something as fictitious as faith- “they wouldn’t think twice about killing anyone whom disagrees with their religious beliefs, unless they want something ”.

 

The world is a more pragmatic place because for every weapon, people like me, put in the hands of these idiots. 

 

But he was worried, he knew more about me than any government agencies, and yet that confused him. 

Clearly he knew that I was interested in the movement of funds through secret entities and, obviously, he was wondering if I was investigating his dealings.

 

As interested as he was, he relaxed when I asked him what he knew about you…

 

He actually thought that I was interested in another arms dealer called Viktor Bout- he pronounced it “boot”.  

I knew then who Bout is and frankly, I found it bizarre that he would inject a Russian arms dealer into our casual discussion.

 

He seemed eager to turn the conversation back to you, he didn’t know anything about you…

 

I told him about raw data that Kroll had shared and the FBI had corroborated  That entities he transferred funds to and from, somehow were also used by individuals with ties to the CIA, some Columbian cartels and other dubious entrepreneurs.

 

His only comment was that he needed to be more careful...

 

It wouldn’t be until 1997 that we would put you and Engelbert Schreiber Sr. into the picture.

 

 

Frankly Karlheinz, you were of no interest to our case until the RCMP in Canada decided to protect you…

 

That’s when we found out about the whole back story whereas you agreed to let media outlets like the CBC, use your name and lead everyone to believe that you had paid the commissions to Mulroney.

 

Of course, you knew all along that Pelosi never stole that money from the pot. In fact, there was no doubt in your mind that Engelbert Schreiber Sr. handled the kick backs.

 

When Pelosi got caught with the cocaine in Chicago- I believe, you had to get rid of the guy because his affiliations with drug dealers. And here you were thinking that he stole money to support his addiction…

 

When I decided to meet with your attorneys in Toronto, you just couldn’t help yourself, you had to come through the lobby to catch a glimpse of me. I appreciated that.

 

Although I knew you were in the office that day, the message I was to convey, had little to do with you, it had to do with the fact that I was about to level the playing field and provide the CBC with evidence that they had the wrong Schreiber.

 

The goal of that exercise was to see what would come next, what you would do, what the CBC would do and of course, what the RCMP would do…

 

It would have been very easy for you to just come out and state that in fact everyone had the wrong Schreiber, but you didn’t.

Harvey Cashore at the CBC’s Fifth Estate could have easily issued a retraction after I provided them with the facts, but then again, you had sued them and the RCMP had Cashore stored away so, well, that could have been messy…

The RCMP could have also corrected the record, they could have came out and just said that you were never involved however, they knew that your accountant was sharing offices with the very guy that Airbus had commissioned to pay Mulroney. They weren’t ready to do you a solid…

 

You, Harvey Cashore and the RCMP somehow came to the conclusion that it would be best to work together and let bygones be bygones. Another former journalist, Stevie Cameron, would get a cool one million dollars bonus from the RCMP through their University of New Brunswick slush fund. Jock Ferguson would get a job with Kroll Inc., certainly he was well paid for that.

 

But when we decided to test the corporate legal courage of Kroll, and tell them that we knew of their role in the investigation of the Airbus circumstances on behalf of the RCMP and the Canadian government, and of course how they were instrumental- voir liable, in aiding in the cover up, well, Jules Kroll- the Chairman of that outfit, decided he was going to help me since he figured no one would listen to me anyway.

 

Of course, by then, 9/11 happened and your secret partner Engelbert Schreiber Sr, suddenly was named in a law suit in New York State as one of the financiers of the attacks. As luck would have it, I paid close attention to that law suit because it was brought on by the family of a man I considered as one of my very few friends. As a former FBI anti terrorism agent, John helped me for years navigating the sea of terrorist financiers and national security no-nos.

Through his family’s lawsuit, I like to cherish the thought that he helped one last time.

 

There was not much room left then, and Harper had no choice, he had to clean it up so, he called for the appointment of the Oliphant commission after I asked what the government intended to do about the fact that the RCMP’s investigation into Airbus led, or otherwise facilitated the financing of the attacks.

One might think that my claims were a little over-the-top but Adnan might beg to differ…

 

Karlheinz, I don’t know that you, or for that matter Mulroney, are terrorists sympathizers, but I did put weapons in your hands and let time and facts take their courses... 

 

I suspect that you read this blog and that your health is fading, I just want to make sure that when you die, you will know that I figured it out.

 

While that might make me a criminal, Adnan would be proud that his lesson wasn’t in vain. 

Daniel M. Deilgat.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Election 2021 Canada: Takin' Care Of Business

At 57 years of age, I decided that this time, I would rely on what I've learned over the years and see if I should vote.

The last time I inadvertently researched any politicians I found that Pierre Elliot Trudeau had a summer job- years before, in a gold mine in Malartic, Quebec. 

Coming from an extended family where the patriarch of the brood worked all of his life in a gold mine, I automatically had respect for the guy..

That was the last time that I ever had respect for a Federal political leader.

Back then, leaders had balls between their legs but now, well, they have accolades up their asses. 

It meant something when a politician said that he did something for Canadians, it seemed like all Canadians won when that happened. 

Perhaps the most significant of these accomplishments came when Canadians were offered the protection of medicare for all. Canadian no longer had to worry about losing loved ones because they couldn't afford the costs of taking care of each other. It meant something positive for all Canadians not just the ones that voted for one political party.

But it isn't like that anymore.

A week ago I attended a candidate debate in Gander, Newfoundland. The Liberal candidate and incumbent is Scott Simms. His Conservative opponents is a guy called Clifford Small. The NDP guy didn't bother to show up so I won't bore you with his name.

I tried to talk to Scott Simms on a few occasions but he never gave me the benefit of a reply or acknowledgment for that matter. I called Clifford Small but I got his answering machine and it was full.

However, about two hours later, my phone rand and sure enough, Mr. Small was calling me back although I never left him a message...

Immediately I was reminded of when politicians actually got involved with their constituents, he showed me right there that action speaks louder than words. I told him that I would be at the debate, and for the first time in my life, I actually sat down and allowed myself to be immersed in bull shit.

The debate was polite, clean as it can be- Small actually referred to Simms as a good Member of Parliament. How about that?

That very statement showed me that Small isn't afraid to respect his fellow Canadians.

That was stunning when you consider that just a few weeks ago, the Liberals weren't sure if Simms was the right candidate for them in Gander... Liberals are concerned with the fact that Simms doesn't engage enough with his constituents. Another point of contention for the party is that Simms voted in the past to support the legitimacy of hate speech against the Liberal caucus. Simms also sided with anti-abortion interests in an other vote.

All in all, Simms is as unpredictable as he is irrational. Both of these traits are synonymous with individual suffering from convenient instincts. In comparison,  persons that deals in truth and respect, are predictable and logical.

In politics now, there are very few selfless individuals such as the likes of Clifford Small. 

I wrote to Scott Simms to address issues of security and law enforcement. The case load I curated over the last 30 years of my life as an information analyst, relates to financial crimes whereas billions of dollars were stolen from unsuspecting Canadians, and people around the world, through a few Canadian companies. The number is well north of 35 billion dollars all together.

The government agencies mandated to protect Canadians from such crimes are non-responsive because most of these circumstances involve one man, Brian Mulroney.

Earlier I wrote about accolades and given what I learned throughout my years as a financial crimes analyst, Canadian politics are contaminated with dangerous special interests that are adverse to Canadian values and human rights.

If you want to vote in this election you need to look at the friends and associates of our politicians. At the individuals that give them money and you must decide if this is in your best interests or if this is an attacks on every Canadian sovereignty.

My files over the years have been shared with the RCMP and just about every member of parliament since the days of Jean Chretien. At no time has anyone in government or law enforcement has ever disputed the claims that were set forth, not even Brian Mulroney, instead they hid.

Throughout the years I travelled the world to acquire documents and statements. I started before the internet was even out there. I talked to government officials, journalists, lawyers involved in money laundering schemes, bankers, terrorist sympathizers as well as terrorist financiers. 

I infiltrated organizations such as mafia organizations, Asian drug cartels, banks and investment firms and yes, even the RCMP here in Canada, all of which is documented and evidenced. 

I had sources within the FBI, the CIA and NSA as well as various defence inteligence agencies in Canada and abroad.

The Canadian government is aware of all this and it is likely that they have extensive surveillance on my role in these circumstances. 

This being said, The Mulroney financial syndicate, over the years, has reached groups involved in organize crime money laundering. From the Catholic Church to Al Quaeda bankers in Liechtenstein, through the financing of known convicted criminals, Mulroney cultivated a complex web of relations designed to reward those who helped him skirt the law in the Airbus case by giving jobs to former RCMP investigators and American military brass. He even got his own son Ben, to Chair a bogus mental health charity financed by Pokerstars parent company, Amaya Gaming of Montreal a company that to this day operates illegally in hundreds of jurisdictions around the world, including Canada.

Mulroney even had a likely role in twarting Interpol warrants to facilitate the entry of fugitives into Canada at the behest of the United States.

The RCMP has evidence that Mulroney's Airbus bribes were handled by a banker with direct ties to Al Qaeda and the financing off the high jackers of the 9/11 attacks. The irony in all of this is that this information came from the RCMP and some of its contractors, we never developed that evidence.

Our organize crime files led us to the last Provincial election in Ontario and the financial support of the Ford Campaign by organize crime organizations with ties to Brian Mulroney. His daughter eventually became, if you can believe that, Attorney General of Ontario in the Ford government. There are no allegations of any wrong doing by Mulroney's daughter, however, the incestuous relationships of her father span a timeline that goes all the way back to the time when he sought the nomination of the party in Winnipeg to her appointment as Attorney General of Ontario.

For those who keep time records, that is almost 38 years ago and that establishes a pattern.

From Justin Trudeau's wife being dressed by Brian Mulroney's daughter in law- wife of Ben, to the relationships that Mulroney nurtured with elements of organized crime, nothing is more notable than the fact that every prime minister since Pierre Elliot Trudeau- to the exceptions of Joe Clark and Stephen Harper, came from the same special interest.

Trudeau, Chretien, Mulroney and Paul Martin all worked or otherwise through marriage and business deals, have a direct relationship with the venerable Des Marais family patriarch, Paul Des Marais.

I can't vote for anyone with such extensive criminal ties and pretend that it is all right, and frankly most Canadians should know that in here, is the irrefutable fact that Canada has been ruled by an organized political family for whom criminal activities over the years is a means to an end.

My hypocrisy only goes so far.

Your Coincidence or Mine...The Fifth Estate's Gish gallop and the RCMP's election manipulation.

This post has been updated following the development of evidence in the election interference matters to be addressed by Justice Marie-Josée Hogue. Saturday, the 9th of September, 2023.

Isaac Asimov once claimed that people are entirely too disbelieving of coincidence. They are far too ready to dismiss it and to build arcane structures of extremely rickety substance in order to avoid it. I, on the other hand, see coincidence everywhere as an inevitable consequence of the laws of probability, according to which having no unusual coincidence is far more unusual than any coincidence could possibly be.

Coincidences are not only a state of mind that individuals will surrender to when no rational explanation is immediately available , they are a convenient tool to sow doubt. 

They are the product of one’s inabilities and/or unwillingness to comprehend how certain circumstances come about.

Sort of a deniable one legged strut.

Life from a newborn's perspective, begins with a continual flow of what appears to be coincidences. Sights, sounds and these characters, how they interact with an apparent purpose of convenience. These observations fill the first moments of life of every human beings, and are the first forms of events that begin as coincidences, that every child rationalizes and accepts as reality, evidence and facts, eventually. 

As children adventure further into life, survival priorities take precedent over the degree of legitimacy we are willing to live with. Suddenly, a child will try to manipulate his mother's conclusions using coincidences as a defence. For example, although the child was alone in the kitchen, he'll imply that it is merely a coincidence that cookies are missing out of the proverbial cookie jar. Just like that, we betray our honesty for the sake of self preservation.

We turn on its head the very abilities that enabled us to appreciate and understand life. We abandon  real integrity for an alternative reality where we argue the validity of our honesty, and force others to prove us wrong...

Clamouring coincidences is often how we prevent others from discovering the facts, the truth. It becomes a way of life, a disease that if left un-checked, affirms the anecdote of one’s life.

For example, a suspect in a criminal case might suggest that a series of unrelated events, out of his or her control, would establish their innocence- often alleged in pseudo- ignorance pleas, if only for the fact that they could not reasonably foresee and avoid the  implications that led to a perceived criminal result. 

This is usually followed by a Gish gallop defence-an erratic technique in which a debater attempts to overwhelm an opponent by excessive number of arguments, without regards for the accuracy or strength of those arguments.

Disentangling such predicaments requires motivation, it requires understanding and commitment, and it can take a long time, a lifetime sometimes...

That’s where I come in and break down the circumstances that will lead any reasonable individual to question the integrity of the CBC's News Journal The Fifth Estate and, more precisely investigative reporter and producer Harvey Cashore.

Let's break it down.

Claim #1: Cashore claims at a lecture for investigative journalist students,  that he first was made aware of the Airbus/Mulroney bribery case by happenstance and in part, through discussions with former Fifth Estate reporter Jock Ferguson- whom eventually broke the story, and Stevie Cameron, a former journalist and anchor for the Fifth Estate.

Truth #1: According to journalist Lucy Komisar, a New York City relative of a CBC News executive first contacted the CBC following claims obtained through leaked statements from an investigative product produced then by Kroll Inc., a juggernaut in the private investigator industry at the times. I contacted Kroll's New York offices once it became clear that, the very journalist that Cashore claimed had sensitized him to the Airbus case, was now working for Kroll's Florida operations- an American company with a Canadian subsidiary that did consulting work for both, the Canadian Government and The RCMP. Soon after my call, Ferguson either resigned or was let go.

Claim #2: Cashore claimed that he found nothing in our files on Isle of Man entities that we provided to him and the CBC's Fifth Estate, at the suggestion of the Vancouver detachment of The RCMP.

Truth #2: According to Stevie Cameron, the research that she and Harvey Cashore did for the book they co-authored, " The Last Amigos", they were aware that Brian Mulroney owned and/or was otherwise involved in the development of condominiums in Telluride Colorado through offshore entities but, they could not link the ownership of the condo, to Isle of Man companies they researched or were otherwise aware of. Now this is surely understandable but, The RCMP was well aware of that fact through the files we had provided to them in 1995, that they returned to us for the purpose of sharing the information with the CBC's fifth Estate. The RCMP was then motivated to work with Cashore and Cameron in order to suppress such information to go public. Cashore and Cameron met in a hotel room at least once, with RCMP Inspectors to discuss the Airbus file, and that is when The CBC, Cashore and Cameron abandoned journalism and deliberately fed the Canadian public half-truths. Stevie Cameron admitted that she became a confidential informant and Harvey Cashore, by association, a co-conspirator in sharing information with the police and, omitting parts of the story willingly and presumably, at the insistence of The RCMP. My contact at The RCMP in Vancouver was well aware of the role of the named Teluride Isle of Man entity in the Airbus case, I wasn't at the time. In fact, when I began questioning the intentions of The RCMP to refuse to take on my clients' case to protect their Airbus case, that is when it was suggested that I provide the file to the CBC. Promptly The RCMP send me the files we had provided in our 1995 complaint. and I provided them to Cashore. These files are posted in part in this blog. 

The auditors of my clients' company were KPMG as evidenced in the documents provided to the CBC.

Claim #3: Stevie Cameron testified in front of the Ethics Committee that she had no conversation with anyone pertaining to the Airbus case before her testimony. 

Truth #3: Both the Chair of the committee and I, as well as a few members of the committee, had written and verbal communications at length, of my conversations with Stevie Cameron in the weeks that led to her testimony. I told Stevie Cameron that they had the wrong Schreiber, that the funds used to pay bribes to Mulroney came from dubious Isle of Man Companies with ties to terrorism financing. Cameron claimed that she would have to dust off her files on the case in her basement to find these Isle of Man documents, but she never testified to such. Stevie Cameron was eventually handed one million dollars from The RCMP and went back to work on another project that was also of particular interest to The RCMP, the case of the missing prostitutes in Vancouver. The RCMP had a vested interest in suppressing the fact that their Vancouver Heroin Squad knew for years of the disappearances of these young women, they used Stevie Cameron to suppress these facts and control the story.

Soon after Harvey Cashore published a book on the matters entitled, "The Truth Shows Up".

In 2021, Harvey Cashore again is producing reports about KPMG schemes to launder money. Again, the Cashore reports are misleading, grossly inaccurate but flattering to The RCMP.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/kpmg-emails-denial-shell-companies-isle-of-man-1.5998374

Soon to follow was a half baked exposé about schools built or not built by the WE Charity in Africa. A crafted report designed to attack the charity, that failed to explore both sides of the issue. 

As a Commission of inquiry has begun in the election interference matters, Cashore, The Fifth Estate and to a certain extent The RCMP, have remained  coincidentally silent. 

The damage to the Trudeau government was already done, the WE story had already manipulated public opinion and The RCMP was once again in control of who gets elected in Canada.

At least one law firm with ties to The RCMP had caused for a Chinese client to compromise Trudeau by designing a scheme whereas financial donations to The Trudeau Foundation could and would later be used against the Prime Minister.  

Now ask yourselves, should you believe what The RCMP, The Fifth Estate and Harvey Cashore are investigating, or is Harvey Cashore producing reports to conceal election interference and mitigate the liabilities The RCMP might incur?