The motive of Vladimir Putin.

 

           

 

By:       Daniel M. Deilgat.

 

You wonder why there is a war in Ukraine?

Answer: Peter Michael Bond.

 

Who you ask? Bond, Peter Bond. But who is that half mythical guy? Well for one he was disqualified by the Isle of Man Supervision Commission as a director of all the shell companies he was involved in.

Peter Bond was involved in the dismantlement of Yukos Oil. 

Actually, the puppet CEO that was installed by Vladimir Putin’s cronies. Stephen Curtis see: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2004/mar/05/russia.oilandpetrol  was killed in a helicopter crash, very similar to the same circumstances that involved the accidental death of all the top managers of Trump Casinos in New Jersey. During the same period, Swiss police carried out raids on homes in Zurich and Geneva after requests from the Russian authorities to help with an investigation into the financial affairs of Yukos.

 

Mr. Curtis was made managing director of Group Menatep, which has a 61% holding in Yukos, the oil group at the centre of a struggle with Russian president Vladimir Putin.

In UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , Petitioners, HULLEY ENTERPRISES LTD., ) YUKOS UNIVERSAL LTD., and ) VETERAN PETROLEUM LTD., ) )  against respondent The Russian Federation, where  Putin tried to cancel the award the petitioners were awarded through arbitration. It wasn’t until May of 2021 that these proceedings came to a head whereas the concern the Claimants’ efforts to enforce in England high-profile arbitral awards handed down in 2014, in which the tribunal found that Russia had unlawfully expropriated the Claimants’ assets and ordered Russia to pay the Claimants approximately $50 billion in compensation (“the Awards”). The Awards are believed to be the largest arbitral awards in history.

 

Now think about this for a second, 50 Billion dollars was the award… That’s what Putin and his cronies were ordered to pay.

 

That was a problem for Putin so, why not invade Ukraine.

 

The noise around the Ukraine invasion is something along the lines that Putin was getting squeezed by his oligarch buddies. Something along the lines of an eye for an eye, where Putin would squeeze his billionaire buddies because he is on the hook for 50 Billion. That’s American dollars Vlad, not Russian Rubles.

 

Back to Bond, I came across a New York Times Journalist that had written a book about Trump not being a billionaire, Tim O’Brien at the time was looking into Bond but he was way too secretive for me, with his encrypted emails and such. He offered to come to Toronto to meet with me, I declined.

 

O’Brien was hot on the trail of Peter Bond but he had nothing that would have complemented my clients’ case.

But I always wondered why the American Justice Department struck a plea deal with Bond, so did O’Brien.

 

Lets be clear here a plea deal with Bond at the time was a plea deal with Putin.

 

I have a few conspiracy theorists friends that jump on the fact that Bond was partnered with Riggs Bank of Washington D.C, calling the bank the CIA’s bank.

 

So we looked into it and we found that in fact Riggs had laundered funds for the pilots of the 9/11 attacks through the former dictator of Chile, Augusto Pinochet.

That sent the American Senate into damage control, and they too decided they had to investigate. Senator Carl Levin of Michigan headed the investigation that relied heavily on the investigative product of O’Brien- at the New York Times, and mine.

 

Riggs was found to have laundered money for Pinochet, the wife of the Saudi Ambassador to Washington, which in turn such funds were disbursed as donations to an organization that subsidized the guys that flew the planes into the World Trade Center on September 11^th, 2001.

 

Yes you read that right, we went to the war in Ukraine and Vladimir Putin, to the 9/11 attacks. 

 

Now don’t take my word for it, look it up. Ask Timothy O’Brien, formerly of the New York Times. 

 

In the end we were right, it was strange that the American Justice Department would cut a deal with a Putin cronie.

 

What is even weirder right now is that the Justice Department has no collective recollection of these facts.

 

Meanwhile children are being killed in Ukraine so Putin can recoup his 50 billion dollars. Look for a deal between the US, England and Russia once the war in Ukraine winds down…

 

Make no mistake, Putin had kompromat on the Americans and the Brits, and that’s how and why you have the Ukraine war. That’s why civilian are being slaughtered.

 

You can also ask George Tenet…

 

 

 

Chief Justice Alban Garon’s Killing: The Movie predicting the murders.

Where is the second suspect in the Garon Murders?

Daniel Deilgat

 

 

The background that led to the murders.

 

Arthur Hailey, a best-selling author, had the misfortune of associating himself with people in Brian Mulroney’s social circle. Bruce Verchere was Brian Mulroney’s tax lawyer and, the same attorney that designed tax schemes so Hailey could avoid paying taxes by moving to the Bermudas.

 

When living in Montreal, the Hailey’s youngest daughter would babysit Verchere’s kids. It was during that period that litigation pertaining to another murder- that of Roberto Calvi, an executive with the Vatican Bank, would be entrusted to Vercheres from Ogilvy, Renaud- Mulroney’s law firm.

 

This would be a significant time for both Verchere and Mulroney, as suddenly, they would be forced to either cooperate with the Italian Mafia or be killed.

Ironically it was the money of the Catholic church that would bring Brian Mulroney, Bruce Verchere and the Mafia on a collision path with Canadian Tax laws and Alban Garon.

 

Eventually Arthur Hailey’s daughter went from being a baby sitter to Bruce Verchere’s kids to getting her pregnant with Bruce Verchere’s twins, much to the dismay of Arthur Hailey and Verchere’s wife.

 

A nasty divorced ensued, Verchere’s wife had money from having sold her law firm accounting software, 17 million to be exact. Her money was diluted in a pot of overseas companies that also included some of the commissions received by Mulroney from Engelbert Schreiber Sr., on behalf of Airbus.

 

When she couldn’t find her money, she had to gain control of the situation, fortunately, her husband committed suicide by shooting himself “twice” in the head according to the SPVM police detectives. 

 

At the time of his suicide, Verchere had just agreed to leave Hailey’s daughter and come back and live with his wife. 

Needless to say that many people close to the family suggest that Verchere’s wife and at least one of his sons would have played a role in his death.

That put Verchere’s wife in a position where she would control the estate and have access to all, of the overseas accounts that her husband had created to hide Mulroney’s money and hers from the tax man here in Canada.

 

Suddenly Mulroney had to negotiate with one pissed off wife who knew damn well that he was getting kickbacks in the Airbus case and had no problems will balck mailling him. 

On her end, Verchere’s widow suddenly had tax issues, she had to bring the money back into Canada, which she could not resolve without some sort of resolution in tax court.

 

With the aid of Alban Garon the lawyer, Brian Mulroney and his tax lawyer’s black mailing wife reached a deal that later was found to significantly disadvantage the Verchere estate. 

 

 

 

 

The Murders 

 

First and foremost a suspect was eventually apprehended in the murder of Justice Garon his wife and a family friend, and one is still on the loose. 

 

Ian Bush. Was found guilty by a jury that took less than two and a half hours to get to a verdict which included a period of a 45 minute recess for lunch…

 

No inconsistencies of evidence were ever analyzed or for that matter looked at. No records of private clients that Alban Garon had as a lawyer after he left the Tax Court either. 

In fact, these murders were sold to the public and the jury in this case as a simple home invasion gone bad. By an individual that had a bone to pick with Garon.

 

3 elderlies in their 70s bound to chairs and gaged. Beaten badly but not shot. All dead and a single credit card missing.

 

Ian Bush apparently did the same thing to a veteran over 100 years old in Ottawa. He tied him to a chair and put a plastic bag over the guy’s head and, yes, one credit card was missing…           

 

Strangely enough, Ian Bush couldn’t kill a 100 year old man with a walker, but he was able to kill three healthy elderlies in their 70s.

 

That’s what the police force of Ottawa police chief Vern White and the OPP of Commissionaire Julian Fantino would have you believe.

 

However, prior to the Ottawa police finding a suspect, I had a brief meeting some detectives of the Ottawa Police about a theory I was looking at, when they came to Toronto.

.

I was leaning towards these murders being tied to Bruce Verchere’s, widow and Brian Mulroney’s handling of their tax predicaments.

 

I pointed the Ottawa detectives in what I am sure they thought was a delusion induced conspiracy theory direction. When I walked away from that meeting, months before they even found Ian Bush, Ottawa detective surely thought I was off my rocker…

 

I gave them a DVD of the movie written years before the murders, by Arthur Hailey whereas in the movie, a serial killer ties elderlies to chairs, mutilates their bodies while they are alive and then kills them and a pattern arises where the killer is following the book of….

According to personal accounts of individuals close to Arthur Hailey, he became so distraught with the situation of his youngest daughter, and his then former tax attorney, that he buried himself in writing what would apparently be his last book. 

 

The story line in Detective is said to have been based on the personal experience of Arthur Hailey and that of his daughter, in the world of Bruce Verchere and Brian Mulroney.

 

The research, the eventual book and subsequent movie, were all developed before the murders of Aban Garon , his wife and their friend.

 

I won’t offer my opinion on why or if Ian Bush actually killed Alban Garon, but I can speculate on the fact that Ian Bush looks nothing like the composite drawing that was drawn through witness interrogations.

 

At best, Ian Bush was not alone when he killed Alban Garon and two others.

 

The Ottawa Police manipulated the evidence and suppressed the evidence that indicated that another killer was in the room. For that, Chief of Ottawa Police had a mysterious meeting in Florida which was concealed as his own wedding, and suddenly to his total surprise, he was appointed by Stephen Harper to the Senate in the same period of time that I had raise the issues.

 

Harper wasn’t done.

 

After The OPP conducted its review of the investigation of the Ottawa Police into their investigation of the Alban Garon murders, Julian Fantino was invited in the fold of the Conservative party, eventually becoming a minister.

 

I had challenged both White and Fantino directly and Prime Minister Harper conspired to shield both.

Years later, at least one other suspect is still out there. Maybe even the actual killer. 

I don't know Ian Bush and I don't think he could have killed anyone, at least not without a partner.

 

 

 View Detective here: 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=583QkHJdVmM

Assessing The Role of FINTRAC in Canada.

 

 

By:              Daniel M. Deilgat

                   Gander, 

  Newfoundland and Labrador

                   Canada.

                   Email:  danieldeilgat@icloud.com

 

FINTRAC is the financial intelligence unit that monitors monetary transactions to identify and prevent illegal activities such as money laundering and financing of terrorist organizations. The center reports to the Minister of Finance, who in turn is accountable to Parliament. FINTRAC is headquartered in Ottawa and has offices in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver.

 

The centre is headed by CEO Sarah Paquet and is a standing member of The Egmont Group.

 

The Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units is an international organization that facilitates cooperation and intelligence sharing between national financial intelligence units (FIUs) to investigate and prevent money laundering and terrorist financing. National FIUs collect information on suspicious or unusual financial activity and are responsible for processing and analyzing the information received. FIUs are normally not law enforcement agencies themselves, findings are shared with appropriate law enforcement or prosecution bodies if sufficient evidence of unlawful activity is found. The Egmont Group is headquartered in Toronto, Ontario, Canada,

 

The take away here is that FINTRAC was formed to “prevent” various forms of money laundering, terrorism financing and a whole slew of national security issues related to financing.

 

So, does FINTRAC work?

 

The short answer is no. 

 

Sure, it detects millions of small transactions and, every once in a while, it will refer matters to various government agencies like the CRA, the RCMP and others under the purview of the Justice Department but, when it counts, the math done by FINTRAC favours the criminals and not the best interests of Canadians.

 

For example, FINTRAC has a yearly budget of approximately 50 million dollars. It has just under 400 employees spread over less than ten offices. Quick math would put the costs of salaries and other related expenses at approximately 40 million dollars. Not sure about rental leases for any of its operations, nor for costs related to operating such staff and facilities but you get the picture.

By the time expenditures are paid, there is no money for investigations for all intensive purposes.

 

So, what is the calculation that guides decisions to cause for the enforcement of money laundering statutes? 

 

None. Government agencies play musical chairs with FINTRAC referrals and when the music stops, everyone gets a chair.

 

A napkin analysis would lead you to conclude that funding for these agencies is determine and allocated by whoever is in government at any given time. That  some of these key politicians are often the first ones to be compromised by the very people that FINTRAC refers to law enforcement agencies.

 

Before FINTRAC, the problem was to divert liability and deniability away from agencies like The CRA and The RCMP, and onto a more nebulous and independent entity, namely FINTRAC.

 

We saw this when Brian Mulroney cannibalized the RCMP budgets to a point that the force had to borrow money from the CRA when they served warrants for various tax centers. The Coup de Grace, Mulroney diluted the national security mandate of the serge and reduced the RCMP to a little more than cops for hire.

 

At that point I no longer wanted to join the Mounties.

 

I got involved in financial crime analysis way before FINTRAC came about. The umbrella of my mandate was multi-pronged. From law firms to casinos, arms dealers to securities fraud and theft, to political intelligence operations, mobsters to terrorists ,a world of illicit money laundering operations revealed itself and my curiosity had no bounds.

 

You would think that having FINTRAC in the tool box would be of great help, it was actually an obstacle. In fact, for every million dollars FINTRAC spends, ten million dollars is embezzled or otherwise stolen from Canadians, investors and global clients of Canadian companies.

 

It was not an accident when Brian Mulroney was nominated as the leader of the Conservative Party. 

Financed through the wealth of an international Conservative group, Mulroney’s government would eventually lay the groundwork to weaken international efforts to combat financial crimes.

 

By the time FINTRAC came about, the baby was thrown out with the bath water. 

 

Over the years countless hours of surveillance of  law firms and the development of schemes designed to provoke reactions from various governmental agencies, organizations and individuals, as well as direct infiltrations of various groups and criminal entities in what became a sting of massive proportions spanning the planet, a pattern emerged that clearly supports the implementation of schemes that were designed to counter any impact organizations like FINTRAC would have on combatting money laundering.

 

In the initial case I stumbled upon scams which led to investigations into how and why he could get away with such extraordinary criminal enterprises.

My direct involvement with international agencies involved in combatting international money laundering through consulting agreements, offered me the opportunities to be absorbed.

 

Having come full circle into the investigation, the conclusion is undeniable, substantial criminal frauds and thefts through money laundering and other mechanisms, in Canada and abroad, would not have survived legal tests would it not be for the complicit blessing of government agencies such as the RCMP, the CRA, FINTRAC and other key peripheral partners of these agencies as well as the former Prime Minister of Canada, The Right Hon. Stephen Harper. 

 

All FINTRAC has accomplished is that, various government agencies have greater access to the private information of Canadians and can better established whom it allowes to commit financial crimes and who should be prosecuted on pro forma statutes.

 

Since FINTRAC was formed, financial crimes in Canada consistently grew exponentially.

 

 

 

 01/11/22