Saturday, November 16, 2024

Mine to the Ambassador of The United States to Canada

Private Desk of:
Daniel M. Deilgat

Gander, Newfoundland and Labrador



The American Embassy in Ottawa

Ambassador David L. Cohen

490 Sussex Drive
Ottawa, Ontario
K1G 1G8
Canada.

Via email


RE: 911 financiers ties to incoming Trump administration

Dear Ambassador.


My name is Daniel Marcel Deilgat I am a self-developed money laundering consultant since  1990.

I am also a former occasional contributor and friend of the Late John P. O’Neil a former officer in charge at the FBI.

On the morning of Tuesday the 11th of September 2001 I promised O’Neil that I would provide the FBI with my files pertaining to the financing of the 9/11 attacks, before the building collapsed on him.

Prior to the fatal day, in June of 2001, July and August of the same year, I made several requests to the RCMP’s E Division in Vancouver, in regards to dubious liquidations of assets in various Isle of Man shell entities. 
After much insistence, the late Sgt. Bennington, humorously, set an appointment with me to discuss the issues with one Sgt. Fozard of the same division.

The date of the appointment was Tuesday, the 11th of September 2001, at 09:00 sharp- never mentioned which time zone.

On September the 12th of the same month, two agents of the national security team of the RCMP, were dispatched to my office after I insisted with the Prime Minister’s office, The Right Hon, Jean Chretien.

The officers in question were not receptive to my representations.

However eventually my files made it through a Senate Committee headed by the late Carl Levine and, the following investigation led to demise of Riggs Bank for its role in the facilitation and distribution of cash that in part, made it to the individuals’ bank accounts,of those who crashed the planes.

I am told that my investigative product made its way to 9/11 commission investigators as well.

Later my investigation linked dubious commissions that were disbursed to former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney. Then Prime Minister Harper succinctly called for the appointment of a Royal Commission, after I advised his office that some of the proceeds paid to Mulroney came from individual being sued by John O’Neil’s estate, whom- according to court documents,  allegedly had a role in the financing of the 9/11 attacks.

In time, my allegations forced the resignation of George Tenet as Director of the CIA and of Dr. Kissinger as Co-Chair of the 9/11 Commission.

An ethics committee in the Canadian Parliament found that indeed I was right and that there was an apparent link between Engelbert Schreiber Sr, the 9/11 attacks and the commissions distributed to former Prime Minister, Brian Mulroney.

However during that period, the DOJ in Washington agreed to a plea deal with one Peter Michael Bond.

Bond was the individual that acted in my clients case as a secretary of Isle of Man shells, that facilitated the liquidation of in excess of $340 million stolen from the company, that I was retained to represent by some Directors of the Board.

It was established that Bond also had direct ties to the Putin administration in Russia, through the illegal appropriations of Yukos oil, while acting in various entities as the manager of illicit funds used in a money laundering scheme that allegedly involved , in part, properties owned and operated by the Trump Organization.

From 1997 until now I kept a muted opinion about the product of my investigations, limiting myself to discuss only publicly available information about the case, through my blog.

I was first made aware of the plea deal between Bond and the DOJ by a former editor of the New York Times, Tim O’Brien.

One source of key evidence was Jules Kroll, the CEO of Kroll Inc.,-himself a former FBI agent. In fact without Kroll, I might never had been able to establish the relationship between Bond, Putin, the financiers of 9/11 attackers and by extension, Donald Trump.

I believe that key individuals in the enforcement apparatus in the US as well as key intelligence officers, shrouded themselves under the national Security act to conceal their roles that led to the attacks.

Would I have know about the raw data pertaining to the attacks in August of 2001, I could have made the association of self-serving interests then, however, time would prove that no one was willing to listen.

Richard Clarke was aware of my investigative product and felt compelled to apologize to the American people in his testimony in from of congress.

Since then and although I have a 30 years history of consistent and well supported facts, I never got one call from anyone telling me I was wrong.

Now, you Republic is about to fall in the hands of your enemies on January 6th of 2025.



Respectfully.


Daniel M. Deilgat.

Wednesday, November 13, 2024

What Putin wants, Trump Gaetz.

 By: Daniel M. Deilgat


Since when does practicing law for five minutes qualifies you to be the Attorney General of those United States?


As anyone in the intelligence community, I am concerned with having a punk like Matt Gaetz put his slimy hands on records that never saw the light of day.

Some of course might be even more worried than me- like former CIA boss George Tenet. 

For those of you who wonder where I am going with this and why it should concern a Canadian citizen with dubious access to some of the most influential individuals on the planet.

In my life I touched on some of the most sensitive investigations like the 9/11 attacks. 

In fact, I had inadvertently warned the authorities here in Canada- and I assume the message was passed to the American equivalent of law enforcement, of unusual movement of tax haven funds in June of 2001.

As it would turn out, would I had been aware of the raw data about terrorism attacks, I could have connected the two by myself... However, the intelligence community knew and would later apologize cryptically.

Why I am concerned? Well let's just say that while I am in control of my investigative products, including the 9/11 case, there are documents at the Department of Defense and, more, importantly in the trust of successive Attorney Generals, that have yet to see the light of day and the scrutiny of evidentiary tests.

Those documents might very well shine an unfavourable light on Donald Trump due to his bromance with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The reasoning is simple, the same guys that funnelled the money for the 9/11 attackers, acted as newly  Putin appointed execs for Yukos oil, when Putin decided to appropriate the company from Michael Khodorkovsky, a Russian Oligarch.

It was through my conversation with former New York Times reporter Tim O'Brien, - yes the guy that wrote the book about Trump not being a billionaire, that I was able to develop the investigative data that led us to the preliminary conclusion that President Putin had a direct relationship with the same individuals that facilitated the payments to the individuals that crashed the planes.

More to the point, my concerns- there are many, is that the Attorney General had struck a deal with Peter Michael Bond, the guy that was instrumental in moving money for President Putin, knowing that Bond- a proxy of the CIA through a company called Riggs-Valmet, had testified in a plea deal about his relationship with Putin.

The file pertaining to the Peter Bond plea deal might, should and/or likely would sway the American public's opinion about who they just elected as their next President. More importantly, whomever tries to destroy such files would unquestionably become an enemy of the state.

Make no mistake, comes January 6th of 2025, Vladimir Putin will use Donald Trump as his proxy, in a revenge plot that has been simmering, since Reagan brought down the wall and Putin was left alone in an East German consulate to burn sensitive KGB documents...

Putin is trying to avoid being perceived as having played a role in murdering 3,000 Americans on American soil.

As for Trump, would he not have been President, God knows how long before he would would have outlasted his usefulness. Luckily, he got the best protection in the world through Secret Services.

In 2016 Americans were wondering what Putin had on Trump. In 2024, they have the evidence in the Attorney General's Office to substantiate the allegations.

Ball is in your court Mr. Merrick Brian Garland, do your job and save America from becoming a Russian banana republic.