The motive of Vladimir Putin.

 

           

 

By:       Daniel M. Deilgat.

 

You wonder why there is a war in Ukraine?

Answer: Peter Michael Bond.

 

Who you ask? Bond, Peter Bond. But who is that half mythical guy? Well for one he was disqualified by the Isle of Man Supervision Commission as a director of all the shell companies he was involved in.

Peter Bond was involved in the dismantlement of Yukos Oil. 

Actually, the puppet CEO that was installed by Vladimir Putin’s cronies. Stephen Curtis see: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2004/mar/05/russia.oilandpetrol  was killed in a helicopter crash, very similar to the same circumstances that involved the accidental death of all the top managers of Trump Casinos in New Jersey. During the same period, Swiss police carried out raids on homes in Zurich and Geneva after requests from the Russian authorities to help with an investigation into the financial affairs of Yukos.

 

Mr. Curtis was made managing director of Group Menatep, which has a 61% holding in Yukos, the oil group at the centre of a struggle with Russian president Vladimir Putin.

In UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , Petitioners, HULLEY ENTERPRISES LTD., ) YUKOS UNIVERSAL LTD., and ) VETERAN PETROLEUM LTD., ) )  against respondent The Russian Federation, where  Putin tried to cancel the award the petitioners were awarded through arbitration. It wasn’t until May of 2021 that these proceedings came to a head whereas the concern the Claimants’ efforts to enforce in England high-profile arbitral awards handed down in 2014, in which the tribunal found that Russia had unlawfully expropriated the Claimants’ assets and ordered Russia to pay the Claimants approximately $50 billion in compensation (“the Awards”). The Awards are believed to be the largest arbitral awards in history.

 

Now think about this for a second, 50 Billion dollars was the award… That’s what Putin and his cronies were ordered to pay.

 

That was a problem for Putin so, why not invade Ukraine.

 

The noise around the Ukraine invasion is something along the lines that Putin was getting squeezed by his oligarch buddies. Something along the lines of an eye for an eye, where Putin would squeeze his billionaire buddies because he is on the hook for 50 Billion. That’s American dollars Vlad, not Russian Rubles.

 

Back to Bond, I came across a New York Times Journalist that had written a book about Trump not being a billionaire, Tim O’Brien at the time was looking into Bond but he was way too secretive for me, with his encrypted emails and such. He offered to come to Toronto to meet with me, I declined.

 

O’Brien was hot on the trail of Peter Bond but he had nothing that would have complemented my clients’ case.

But I always wondered why the American Justice Department struck a plea deal with Bond, so did O’Brien.

 

Lets be clear here a plea deal with Bond at the time was a plea deal with Putin.

 

I have a few conspiracy theorists friends that jump on the fact that Bond was partnered with Riggs Bank of Washington D.C, calling the bank the CIA’s bank.

 

So we looked into it and we found that in fact Riggs had laundered funds for the pilots of the 9/11 attacks through the former dictator of Chile, Augusto Pinochet.

That sent the American Senate into damage control, and they too decided they had to investigate. Senator Carl Levin of Michigan headed the investigation that relied heavily on the investigative product of O’Brien- at the New York Times, and mine.

 

Riggs was found to have laundered money for Pinochet, the wife of the Saudi Ambassador to Washington, which in turn such funds were disbursed as donations to an organization that subsidized the guys that flew the planes into the World Trade Center on September 11^th, 2001.

 

Yes you read that right, we went to the war in Ukraine and Vladimir Putin, to the 9/11 attacks. 

 

Now don’t take my word for it, look it up. Ask Timothy O’Brien, formerly of the New York Times. 

 

In the end we were right, it was strange that the American Justice Department would cut a deal with a Putin cronie.

 

What is even weirder right now is that the Justice Department has no collective recollection of these facts.

 

Meanwhile children are being killed in Ukraine so Putin can recoup his 50 billion dollars. Look for a deal between the US, England and Russia once the war in Ukraine winds down…

 

Make no mistake, Putin had kompromat on the Americans and the Brits, and that’s how and why you have the Ukraine war. That’s why civilian are being slaughtered.

 

You can also ask George Tenet…

 

 

 

Chief Justice Alban Garon’s Killing: The Movie predicting the murders.

Where is the second suspect in the Garon Murders?

Daniel Deilgat

 

 

The background that led to the murders.

 

Arthur Hailey, a best-selling author, had the misfortune of associating himself with people in Brian Mulroney’s social circle. Bruce Verchere was Brian Mulroney’s tax lawyer and, the same attorney that designed tax schemes so Hailey could avoid paying taxes by moving to the Bermudas.

 

When living in Montreal, the Hailey’s youngest daughter would babysit Verchere’s kids. It was during that period that litigation pertaining to another murder- that of Roberto Calvi, an executive with the Vatican Bank, would be entrusted to Vercheres from Ogilvy, Renaud- Mulroney’s law firm.

 

This would be a significant time for both Verchere and Mulroney, as suddenly, they would be forced to either cooperate with the Italian Mafia or be killed.

Ironically it was the money of the Catholic church that would bring Brian Mulroney, Bruce Verchere and the Mafia on a collision path with Canadian Tax laws and Alban Garon.

 

Eventually Arthur Hailey’s daughter went from being a baby sitter to Bruce Verchere’s kids to getting her pregnant with Bruce Verchere’s twins, much to the dismay of Arthur Hailey and Verchere’s wife.

 

A nasty divorced ensued, Verchere’s wife had money from having sold her law firm accounting software, 17 million to be exact. Her money was diluted in a pot of overseas companies that also included some of the commissions received by Mulroney from Engelbert Schreiber Sr., on behalf of Airbus.

 

When she couldn’t find her money, she had to gain control of the situation, fortunately, her husband committed suicide by shooting himself “twice” in the head according to the SPVM police detectives. 

 

At the time of his suicide, Verchere had just agreed to leave Hailey’s daughter and come back and live with his wife. 

Needless to say that many people close to the family suggest that Verchere’s wife and at least one of his sons would have played a role in his death.

That put Verchere’s wife in a position where she would control the estate and have access to all, of the overseas accounts that her husband had created to hide Mulroney’s money and hers from the tax man here in Canada.

 

Suddenly Mulroney had to negotiate with one pissed off wife who knew damn well that he was getting kickbacks in the Airbus case and had no problems will balck mailling him. 

On her end, Verchere’s widow suddenly had tax issues, she had to bring the money back into Canada, which she could not resolve without some sort of resolution in tax court.

 

With the aid of Alban Garon the lawyer, Brian Mulroney and his tax lawyer’s black mailing wife reached a deal that later was found to significantly disadvantage the Verchere estate. 

 

 

 

 

The Murders 

 

First and foremost a suspect was eventually apprehended in the murder of Justice Garon his wife and a family friend, and one is still on the loose. 

 

Ian Bush. Was found guilty by a jury that took less than two and a half hours to get to a verdict which included a period of a 45 minute recess for lunch…

 

No inconsistencies of evidence were ever analyzed or for that matter looked at. No records of private clients that Alban Garon had as a lawyer after he left the Tax Court either. 

In fact, these murders were sold to the public and the jury in this case as a simple home invasion gone bad. By an individual that had a bone to pick with Garon.

 

3 elderlies in their 70s bound to chairs and gaged. Beaten badly but not shot. All dead and a single credit card missing.

 

Ian Bush apparently did the same thing to a veteran over 100 years old in Ottawa. He tied him to a chair and put a plastic bag over the guy’s head and, yes, one credit card was missing…           

 

Strangely enough, Ian Bush couldn’t kill a 100 year old man with a walker, but he was able to kill three healthy elderlies in their 70s.

 

That’s what the police force of Ottawa police chief Vern White and the OPP of Commissionaire Julian Fantino would have you believe.

 

However, prior to the Ottawa police finding a suspect, I had a brief meeting some detectives of the Ottawa Police about a theory I was looking at, when they came to Toronto.

.

I was leaning towards these murders being tied to Bruce Verchere’s, widow and Brian Mulroney’s handling of their tax predicaments.

 

I pointed the Ottawa detectives in what I am sure they thought was a delusion induced conspiracy theory direction. When I walked away from that meeting, months before they even found Ian Bush, Ottawa detective surely thought I was off my rocker…

 

I gave them a DVD of the movie written years before the murders, by Arthur Hailey whereas in the movie, a serial killer ties elderlies to chairs, mutilates their bodies while they are alive and then kills them and a pattern arises where the killer is following the book of….

According to personal accounts of individuals close to Arthur Hailey, he became so distraught with the situation of his youngest daughter, and his then former tax attorney, that he buried himself in writing what would apparently be his last book. 

 

The story line in Detective is said to have been based on the personal experience of Arthur Hailey and that of his daughter, in the world of Bruce Verchere and Brian Mulroney.

 

The research, the eventual book and subsequent movie, were all developed before the murders of Aban Garon , his wife and their friend.

 

I won’t offer my opinion on why or if Ian Bush actually killed Alban Garon, but I can speculate on the fact that Ian Bush looks nothing like the composite drawing that was drawn through witness interrogations.

 

At best, Ian Bush was not alone when he killed Alban Garon and two others.

 

The Ottawa Police manipulated the evidence and suppressed the evidence that indicated that another killer was in the room. For that, Chief of Ottawa Police had a mysterious meeting in Florida which was concealed as his own wedding, and suddenly to his total surprise, he was appointed by Stephen Harper to the Senate in the same period of time that I had raise the issues.

 

Harper wasn’t done.

 

After The OPP conducted its review of the investigation of the Ottawa Police into their investigation of the Alban Garon murders, Julian Fantino was invited in the fold of the Conservative party, eventually becoming a minister.

 

I had challenged both White and Fantino directly and Prime Minister Harper conspired to shield both.

Years later, at least one other suspect is still out there. Maybe even the actual killer. 

I don't know Ian Bush and I don't think he could have killed anyone, at least not without a partner.

 

 

 View Detective here: 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=583QkHJdVmM

Assessing The Role of FINTRAC in Canada.

 

 

By:              Daniel M. Deilgat

                   Gander, 

  Newfoundland and Labrador

                   Canada.

                   Email:  danieldeilgat@icloud.com

 

FINTRAC is the financial intelligence unit that monitors monetary transactions to identify and prevent illegal activities such as money laundering and financing of terrorist organizations. The center reports to the Minister of Finance, who in turn is accountable to Parliament. FINTRAC is headquartered in Ottawa and has offices in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver.

 

The centre is headed by CEO Sarah Paquet and is a standing member of The Egmont Group.

 

The Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units is an international organization that facilitates cooperation and intelligence sharing between national financial intelligence units (FIUs) to investigate and prevent money laundering and terrorist financing. National FIUs collect information on suspicious or unusual financial activity and are responsible for processing and analyzing the information received. FIUs are normally not law enforcement agencies themselves, findings are shared with appropriate law enforcement or prosecution bodies if sufficient evidence of unlawful activity is found. The Egmont Group is headquartered in Toronto, Ontario, Canada,

 

The take away here is that FINTRAC was formed to “prevent” various forms of money laundering, terrorism financing and a whole slew of national security issues related to financing.

 

So, does FINTRAC work?

 

The short answer is no. 

 

Sure, it detects millions of small transactions and, every once in a while, it will refer matters to various government agencies like the CRA, the RCMP and others under the purview of the Justice Department but, when it counts, the math done by FINTRAC favours the criminals and not the best interests of Canadians.

 

For example, FINTRAC has a yearly budget of approximately 50 million dollars. It has just under 400 employees spread over less than ten offices. Quick math would put the costs of salaries and other related expenses at approximately 40 million dollars. Not sure about rental leases for any of its operations, nor for costs related to operating such staff and facilities but you get the picture.

By the time expenditures are paid, there is no money for investigations for all intensive purposes.

 

So, what is the calculation that guides decisions to cause for the enforcement of money laundering statutes? 

 

None. Government agencies play musical chairs with FINTRAC referrals and when the music stops, everyone gets a chair.

 

A napkin analysis would lead you to conclude that funding for these agencies is determine and allocated by whoever is in government at any given time. That  some of these key politicians are often the first ones to be compromised by the very people that FINTRAC refers to law enforcement agencies.

 

Before FINTRAC, the problem was to divert liability and deniability away from agencies like The CRA and The RCMP, and onto a more nebulous and independent entity, namely FINTRAC.

 

We saw this when Brian Mulroney cannibalized the RCMP budgets to a point that the force had to borrow money from the CRA when they served warrants for various tax centers. The Coup de Grace, Mulroney diluted the national security mandate of the serge and reduced the RCMP to a little more than cops for hire.

 

At that point I no longer wanted to join the Mounties.

 

I got involved in financial crime analysis way before FINTRAC came about. The umbrella of my mandate was multi-pronged. From law firms to casinos, arms dealers to securities fraud and theft, to political intelligence operations, mobsters to terrorists ,a world of illicit money laundering operations revealed itself and my curiosity had no bounds.

 

You would think that having FINTRAC in the tool box would be of great help, it was actually an obstacle. In fact, for every million dollars FINTRAC spends, ten million dollars is embezzled or otherwise stolen from Canadians, investors and global clients of Canadian companies.

 

It was not an accident when Brian Mulroney was nominated as the leader of the Conservative Party. 

Financed through the wealth of an international Conservative group, Mulroney’s government would eventually lay the groundwork to weaken international efforts to combat financial crimes.

 

By the time FINTRAC came about, the baby was thrown out with the bath water. 

 

Over the years countless hours of surveillance of  law firms and the development of schemes designed to provoke reactions from various governmental agencies, organizations and individuals, as well as direct infiltrations of various groups and criminal entities in what became a sting of massive proportions spanning the planet, a pattern emerged that clearly supports the implementation of schemes that were designed to counter any impact organizations like FINTRAC would have on combatting money laundering.

 

In the initial case I stumbled upon scams which led to investigations into how and why he could get away with such extraordinary criminal enterprises.

My direct involvement with international agencies involved in combatting international money laundering through consulting agreements, offered me the opportunities to be absorbed.

 

Having come full circle into the investigation, the conclusion is undeniable, substantial criminal frauds and thefts through money laundering and other mechanisms, in Canada and abroad, would not have survived legal tests would it not be for the complicit blessing of government agencies such as the RCMP, the CRA, FINTRAC and other key peripheral partners of these agencies as well as the former Prime Minister of Canada, The Right Hon. Stephen Harper. 

 

All FINTRAC has accomplished is that, various government agencies have greater access to the private information of Canadians and can better established whom it allowes to commit financial crimes and who should be prosecuted on pro forma statutes.

 

Since FINTRAC was formed, financial crimes in Canada consistently grew exponentially.

 

 

 

 01/11/22

 

Milkman’s Son: A letter to Karlheinz Schreiber

 

Note: While some individuals named herein are now deceased, the facts reduced herein should never have been ignore by a police force such as The Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

 

Dear Karlheinz.

 

Adnan Kashoogi once corrected me, when I asked him how he felt about being referred to as an arms dealer, he said, “if people call you an arms dealer, they mean murderer, but I don’t feel like a criminal.”…

 

I had to ask:” you mean that you don’t feel like a murderer?”

 

He was annoyed, he took a sip of that $10 water-that I paid for, and then  remarked that perhaps I should be arrested, for providing him a glass of water … 

 

He wasn’t done, I was to be bombarded with principles of Cognitive Dissonance…

 

You know, he said, how many people are killed each year by water or the lack of it?

Do you think that people would stop fighting if there were no guns? 

Do you accuse your priest- you’re Catholic right?, why his church spreads beliefs that inevitably lead to wars? 

Do you condemn the Catholic church for killing tens of thousands of native children in this country? – Although this conversation took place in 1992, somehow, he seemed to be aware of the circumstances…

Do you call them “Faith Dealers” as if you meant that they, like me are implied criminals?

 

Suddenly he seemed amused by his logic, or maybe it was by the look on my face.

 

He would continue,” there is no Santa Claus, so are your parents criminals for letting you believe in such ridiculous charade?”

 

He would conclude that he wanted to have this conversation for a long time. He wanted to liberate, extract that innocence from someone, but everyone he knew are mostly Muslims, and much more unsophisticated when it came to believing in something as fictitious as faith- “they wouldn’t think twice about killing anyone whom disagrees with their religious beliefs, unless they want something ”.

 

The world is a more pragmatic place because for every weapon, people like me, put in the hands of these idiots. 

 

But he was worried, he knew more about me than any government agencies, and yet that confused him. 

Clearly he knew that I was interested in the movement of funds through secret entities and, obviously, he was wondering if I was investigating his dealings.

 

As interested as he was, he relaxed when I asked him what he knew about you…

 

He actually thought that I was interested in another arms dealer called Viktor Bout- he pronounced it “boot”.  

I knew then who Bout is and frankly, I found it bizarre that he would inject a Russian arms dealer into our casual discussion.

 

He seemed eager to turn the conversation back to you, he didn’t know anything about you…

 

I told him about raw data that Kroll had shared and the FBI had corroborated  That entities he transferred funds to and from, somehow were also used by individuals with ties to the CIA, some Columbian cartels and other dubious entrepreneurs.

 

His only comment was that he needed to be more careful...

 

It wouldn’t be until 1997 that we would put you and Engelbert Schreiber Sr. into the picture.

 

 

Frankly Karlheinz, you were of no interest to our case until the RCMP in Canada decided to protect you…

 

That’s when we found out about the whole back story whereas you agreed to let media outlets like the CBC, use your name and lead everyone to believe that you had paid the commissions to Mulroney.

 

Of course, you knew all along that Pelosi never stole that money from the pot. In fact, there was no doubt in your mind that Engelbert Schreiber Sr. handled the kick backs.

 

When Pelosi got caught with the cocaine in Chicago- I believe, you had to get rid of the guy because his affiliations with drug dealers. And here you were thinking that he stole money to support his addiction…

 

When I decided to meet with your attorneys in Toronto, you just couldn’t help yourself, you had to come through the lobby to catch a glimpse of me. I appreciated that.

 

Although I knew you were in the office that day, the message I was to convey, had little to do with you, it had to do with the fact that I was about to level the playing field and provide the CBC with evidence that they had the wrong Schreiber.

 

The goal of that exercise was to see what would come next, what you would do, what the CBC would do and of course, what the RCMP would do…

 

It would have been very easy for you to just come out and state that in fact everyone had the wrong Schreiber, but you didn’t.

Harvey Cashore at the CBC’s Fifth Estate could have easily issued a retraction after I provided them with the facts, but then again, you had sued them and the RCMP had Cashore stored away so, well, that could have been messy…

The RCMP could have also corrected the record, they could have came out and just said that you were never involved however, they knew that your accountant was sharing offices with the very guy that Airbus had commissioned to pay Mulroney. They weren’t ready to do you a solid…

 

You, Harvey Cashore and the RCMP somehow came to the conclusion that it would be best to work together and let bygones be bygones. Another former journalist, Stevie Cameron, would get a cool one million dollars bonus from the RCMP through their University of New Brunswick slush fund. Jock Ferguson would get a job with Kroll Inc., certainly he was well paid for that.

 

But when we decided to test the corporate legal courage of Kroll, and tell them that we knew of their role in the investigation of the Airbus circumstances on behalf of the RCMP and the Canadian government, and of course how they were instrumental- voir liable, in aiding in the cover up, well, Jules Kroll- the Chairman of that outfit, decided he was going to help me since he figured no one would listen to me anyway.

 

Of course, by then, 9/11 happened and your secret partner Engelbert Schreiber Sr, suddenly was named in a law suit in New York State as one of the financiers of the attacks. As luck would have it, I paid close attention to that law suit because it was brought on by the family of a man I considered as one of my very few friends. As a former FBI anti terrorism agent, John helped me for years navigating the sea of terrorist financiers and national security no-nos.

Through his family’s lawsuit, I like to cherish the thought that he helped one last time.

 

There was not much room left then, and Harper had no choice, he had to clean it up so, he called for the appointment of the Oliphant commission after I asked what the government intended to do about the fact that the RCMP’s investigation into Airbus led, or otherwise facilitated the financing of the attacks.

One might think that my claims were a little over-the-top but Adnan might beg to differ…

 

Karlheinz, I don’t know that you, or for that matter Mulroney, are terrorists sympathizers, but I did put weapons in your hands and let time and facts take their courses... 

 

I suspect that you read this blog and that your health is fading, I just want to make sure that when you die, you will know that I figured it out.

 

While that might make me a criminal, Adnan would be proud that his lesson wasn’t in vain. 

Daniel M. Deilgat.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Election 2021 Canada: Takin' Care Of Business

At 57 years of age, I decided that this time, I would rely on what I've learned over the years and see if I should vote.

The last time I inadvertently researched any politicians I found that Pierre Elliot Trudeau had a summer job- years before, in a gold mine in Malartic, Quebec. 

Coming from an extended family where the patriarch of the brood worked all of his life in a gold mine, I automatically had respect for the guy..

That was the last time that I ever had respect for a Federal political leader.

Back then, leaders had balls between their legs but now, well, they have accolades up their asses. 

It meant something when a politician said that he did something for Canadians, it seemed like all Canadians won when that happened. 

Perhaps the most significant of these accomplishments came when Canadians were offered the protection of medicare for all. Canadian no longer had to worry about losing loved ones because they couldn't afford the costs of taking care of each other. It meant something positive for all Canadians not just the ones that voted for one political party.

But it isn't like that anymore.

A week ago I attended a candidate debate in Gander, Newfoundland. The Liberal candidate and incumbent is Scott Simms. His Conservative opponents is a guy called Clifford Small. The NDP guy didn't bother to show up so I won't bore you with his name.

I tried to talk to Scott Simms on a few occasions but he never gave me the benefit of a reply or acknowledgment for that matter. I called Clifford Small but I got his answering machine and it was full.

However, about two hours later, my phone rand and sure enough, Mr. Small was calling me back although I never left him a message...

Immediately I was reminded of when politicians actually got involved with their constituents, he showed me right there that action speaks louder than words. I told him that I would be at the debate, and for the first time in my life, I actually sat down and allowed myself to be immersed in bull shit.

The debate was polite, clean as it can be- Small actually referred to Simms as a good Member of Parliament. How about that?

That very statement showed me that Small isn't afraid to respect his fellow Canadians.

That was stunning when you consider that just a few weeks ago, the Liberals weren't sure if Simms was the right candidate for them in Gander... Liberals are concerned with the fact that Simms doesn't engage enough with his constituents. Another point of contention for the party is that Simms voted in the past to support the legitimacy of hate speech against the Liberal caucus. Simms also sided with anti-abortion interests in an other vote.

All in all, Simms is as unpredictable as he is irrational. Both of these traits are synonymous with individual suffering from convenient instincts. In comparison,  persons that deals in truth and respect, are predictable and logical.

In politics now, there are very few selfless individuals such as the likes of Clifford Small. 

I wrote to Scott Simms to address issues of security and law enforcement. The case load I curated over the last 30 years of my life as an information analyst, relates to financial crimes whereas billions of dollars were stolen from unsuspecting Canadians, and people around the world, through a few Canadian companies. The number is well north of 35 billion dollars all together.

The government agencies mandated to protect Canadians from such crimes are non-responsive because most of these circumstances involve one man, Brian Mulroney.

Earlier I wrote about accolades and given what I learned throughout my years as a financial crimes analyst, Canadian politics are contaminated with dangerous special interests that are adverse to Canadian values and human rights.

If you want to vote in this election you need to look at the friends and associates of our politicians. At the individuals that give them money and you must decide if this is in your best interests or if this is an attacks on every Canadian sovereignty.

My files over the years have been shared with the RCMP and just about every member of parliament since the days of Jean Chretien. At no time has anyone in government or law enforcement has ever disputed the claims that were set forth, not even Brian Mulroney, instead they hid.

Throughout the years I travelled the world to acquire documents and statements. I started before the internet was even out there. I talked to government officials, journalists, lawyers involved in money laundering schemes, bankers, terrorist sympathizers as well as terrorist financiers. 

I infiltrated organizations such as mafia organizations, Asian drug cartels, banks and investment firms and yes, even the RCMP here in Canada, all of which is documented and evidenced. 

I had sources within the FBI, the CIA and NSA as well as various defence inteligence agencies in Canada and abroad.

The Canadian government is aware of all this and it is likely that they have extensive surveillance on my role in these circumstances. 

This being said, The Mulroney financial syndicate, over the years, has reached groups involved in organize crime money laundering. From the Catholic Church to Al Quaeda bankers in Liechtenstein, through the financing of known convicted criminals, Mulroney cultivated a complex web of relations designed to reward those who helped him skirt the law in the Airbus case by giving jobs to former RCMP investigators and American military brass. He even got his own son Ben, to Chair a bogus mental health charity financed by Pokerstars parent company, Amaya Gaming of Montreal a company that to this day operates illegally in hundreds of jurisdictions around the world, including Canada.

Mulroney even had a likely role in twarting Interpol warrants to facilitate the entry of fugitives into Canada at the behest of the United States.

The RCMP has evidence that Mulroney's Airbus bribes were handled by a banker with direct ties to Al Qaeda and the financing off the high jackers of the 9/11 attacks. The irony in all of this is that this information came from the RCMP and some of its contractors, we never developed that evidence.

Our organize crime files led us to the last Provincial election in Ontario and the financial support of the Ford Campaign by organize crime organizations with ties to Brian Mulroney. His daughter eventually became, if you can believe that, Attorney General of Ontario in the Ford government. There are no allegations of any wrong doing by Mulroney's daughter, however, the incestuous relationships of her father span a timeline that goes all the way back to the time when he sought the nomination of the party in Winnipeg to her appointment as Attorney General of Ontario.

For those who keep time records, that is almost 38 years ago and that establishes a pattern.

From Justin Trudeau's wife being dressed by Brian Mulroney's daughter in law- wife of Ben, to the relationships that Mulroney nurtured with elements of organized crime, nothing is more notable than the fact that every prime minister since Pierre Elliot Trudeau- to the exceptions of Joe Clark and Stephen Harper, came from the same special interest.

Trudeau, Chretien, Mulroney and Paul Martin all worked or otherwise through marriage and business deals, have a direct relationship with the venerable Des Marais family patriarch, Paul Des Marais.

I can't vote for anyone with such extensive criminal ties and pretend that it is all right, and frankly most Canadians should know that in here, is the irrefutable fact that Canada has been ruled by an organized political family for whom criminal activities over the years is a means to an end.

My hypocrisy only goes so far.

Your Coincidence or Mine...The Fifth Estate's Gish gallop and the RCMP's election manipulation.

This post has been updated following the development of evidence in the election interference matters to be addressed by Justice Marie-Josée Hogue. Saturday, the 9th of September, 2023.

Isaac Asimov once claimed that people are entirely too disbelieving of coincidence. They are far too ready to dismiss it and to build arcane structures of extremely rickety substance in order to avoid it. I, on the other hand, see coincidence everywhere as an inevitable consequence of the laws of probability, according to which having no unusual coincidence is far more unusual than any coincidence could possibly be.

Coincidences are not only a state of mind that individuals will surrender to when no rational explanation is immediately available , they are a convenient tool to sow doubt. 

They are the product of one’s inabilities and/or unwillingness to comprehend how certain circumstances come about.

Sort of a deniable one legged strut.

Life from a newborn's perspective, begins with a continual flow of what appears to be coincidences. Sights, sounds and these characters, how they interact with an apparent purpose of convenience. These observations fill the first moments of life of every human beings, and are the first forms of events that begin as coincidences, that every child rationalizes and accepts as reality, evidence and facts, eventually. 

As children adventure further into life, survival priorities take precedent over the degree of legitimacy we are willing to live with. Suddenly, a child will try to manipulate his mother's conclusions using coincidences as a defence. For example, although the child was alone in the kitchen, he'll imply that it is merely a coincidence that cookies are missing out of the proverbial cookie jar. Just like that, we betray our honesty for the sake of self preservation.

We turn on its head the very abilities that enabled us to appreciate and understand life. We abandon  real integrity for an alternative reality where we argue the validity of our honesty, and force others to prove us wrong...

Clamouring coincidences is often how we prevent others from discovering the facts, the truth. It becomes a way of life, a disease that if left un-checked, affirms the anecdote of one’s life.

For example, a suspect in a criminal case might suggest that a series of unrelated events, out of his or her control, would establish their innocence- often alleged in pseudo- ignorance pleas, if only for the fact that they could not reasonably foresee and avoid the  implications that led to a perceived criminal result. 

This is usually followed by a Gish gallop defence-an erratic technique in which a debater attempts to overwhelm an opponent by excessive number of arguments, without regards for the accuracy or strength of those arguments.

Disentangling such predicaments requires motivation, it requires understanding and commitment, and it can take a long time, a lifetime sometimes...

That’s where I come in and break down the circumstances that will lead any reasonable individual to question the integrity of the CBC's News Journal The Fifth Estate and, more precisely investigative reporter and producer Harvey Cashore.

Let's break it down.

Claim #1: Cashore claims at a lecture for investigative journalist students,  that he first was made aware of the Airbus/Mulroney bribery case by happenstance and in part, through discussions with former Fifth Estate reporter Jock Ferguson- whom eventually broke the story, and Stevie Cameron, a former journalist and anchor for the Fifth Estate.

Truth #1: According to journalist Lucy Komisar, a New York City relative of a CBC News executive first contacted the CBC following claims obtained through leaked statements from an investigative product produced then by Kroll Inc., a juggernaut in the private investigator industry at the times. I contacted Kroll's New York offices once it became clear that, the very journalist that Cashore claimed had sensitized him to the Airbus case, was now working for Kroll's Florida operations- an American company with a Canadian subsidiary that did consulting work for both, the Canadian Government and The RCMP. Soon after my call, Ferguson either resigned or was let go.

Claim #2: Cashore claimed that he found nothing in our files on Isle of Man entities that we provided to him and the CBC's Fifth Estate, at the suggestion of the Vancouver detachment of The RCMP.

Truth #2: According to Stevie Cameron, the research that she and Harvey Cashore did for the book they co-authored, " The Last Amigos", they were aware that Brian Mulroney owned and/or was otherwise involved in the development of condominiums in Telluride Colorado through offshore entities but, they could not link the ownership of the condo, to Isle of Man companies they researched or were otherwise aware of. Now this is surely understandable but, The RCMP was well aware of that fact through the files we had provided to them in 1995, that they returned to us for the purpose of sharing the information with the CBC's fifth Estate. The RCMP was then motivated to work with Cashore and Cameron in order to suppress such information to go public. Cashore and Cameron met in a hotel room at least once, with RCMP Inspectors to discuss the Airbus file, and that is when The CBC, Cashore and Cameron abandoned journalism and deliberately fed the Canadian public half-truths. Stevie Cameron admitted that she became a confidential informant and Harvey Cashore, by association, a co-conspirator in sharing information with the police and, omitting parts of the story willingly and presumably, at the insistence of The RCMP. My contact at The RCMP in Vancouver was well aware of the role of the named Teluride Isle of Man entity in the Airbus case, I wasn't at the time. In fact, when I began questioning the intentions of The RCMP to refuse to take on my clients' case to protect their Airbus case, that is when it was suggested that I provide the file to the CBC. Promptly The RCMP send me the files we had provided in our 1995 complaint. and I provided them to Cashore. These files are posted in part in this blog. 

The auditors of my clients' company were KPMG as evidenced in the documents provided to the CBC.

Claim #3: Stevie Cameron testified in front of the Ethics Committee that she had no conversation with anyone pertaining to the Airbus case before her testimony. 

Truth #3: Both the Chair of the committee and I, as well as a few members of the committee, had written and verbal communications at length, of my conversations with Stevie Cameron in the weeks that led to her testimony. I told Stevie Cameron that they had the wrong Schreiber, that the funds used to pay bribes to Mulroney came from dubious Isle of Man Companies with ties to terrorism financing. Cameron claimed that she would have to dust off her files on the case in her basement to find these Isle of Man documents, but she never testified to such. Stevie Cameron was eventually handed one million dollars from The RCMP and went back to work on another project that was also of particular interest to The RCMP, the case of the missing prostitutes in Vancouver. The RCMP had a vested interest in suppressing the fact that their Vancouver Heroin Squad knew for years of the disappearances of these young women, they used Stevie Cameron to suppress these facts and control the story.

Soon after Harvey Cashore published a book on the matters entitled, "The Truth Shows Up".

In 2021, Harvey Cashore again is producing reports about KPMG schemes to launder money. Again, the Cashore reports are misleading, grossly inaccurate but flattering to The RCMP.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/kpmg-emails-denial-shell-companies-isle-of-man-1.5998374

Soon to follow was a half baked exposé about schools built or not built by the WE Charity in Africa. A crafted report designed to attack the charity, that failed to explore both sides of the issue. 

As a Commission of inquiry has begun in the election interference matters, Cashore, The Fifth Estate and to a certain extent The RCMP, have remained  coincidentally silent. 

The damage to the Trudeau government was already done, the WE story had already manipulated public opinion and The RCMP was once again in control of who gets elected in Canada.

At least one law firm with ties to The RCMP had caused for a Chinese client to compromise Trudeau by designing a scheme whereas financial donations to The Trudeau Foundation could and would later be used against the Prime Minister.  

Now ask yourselves, should you believe what The RCMP, The Fifth Estate and Harvey Cashore are investigating, or is Harvey Cashore producing reports to conceal election interference and mitigate the liabilities The RCMP might incur?

Brian Mulroney needs to give answers that only Schreiber has

 

SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2008

Brian Mulroney needs to give answers that only Schreiber has

Friday, September 07, 2007

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario

Is Brian Mulroney victim of the machinations and manipulations of a desperate man?There’s nothing I despise more than having to defend someone who doesn’t deserve it. But let that be a reminder to those who will read this, if a cold blooded murderer can have children and truly loved them then there must be something good deep inside that man, something worth respecting.Mulroney’s problem has always been greed. Money drove his life and was the architect of his dreams. His personal wealth was always first, Canada, I presume, might have come in third after his family but in the end, money was everything he needed the rest was a bi-product of his wallet and the generosity of those who‘s needs Mulroney was in a position to advance.That brings in Karlheinz Schreiber, a man who’s job it was to indiscriminately shower the right people with cash. Mulroney was in the right place at the right time, it was a marriage made in… the bank.Schreiber is a reputed arms dealer and the sharpest tool in the shed. He said it himself, he might be ugly but he’s not stupid.I remember sitting behind Schreiber in a Toronto court looking at him smiling in an approving manner at the judge from his seat, as if he understood exactly why these lawyers were arguing over some futile circumstances that were really a misunderstanding. He looked like the father who would let the children argue until they realized that they wasted their time.Schreiber and his wife attending court as if it was Sunday morning church, kids in tow and dressed to the nines.I remembered thinking just how surreal this all looked. Here is a man on trial in a deportation hearing for bringing down the government of Chancellor Kohl, a man that sold tanks to the Saudis and had direct connections with Saddam Hussein and Al-Qaeda. I couldn’t help looking at his wife and wondering how someone so Christian looking could be with a man who’s product kills children an innocent civilians by the thousand.I had a hard time focusing on the debate in front of me, all I could remember is Eddie Greenspan going on and on about a book. Greenspan was fixated with this book, every reply was this book this, that book that…Of course he was talking about Stevie Cameron’s book, The Last Amigo, a book she co-authored with a producer of CBC’s Fifth Estate, Harvey Cashore. Greenspan was right to question the crown’s quote taken right out of the book, Greenspan knew the book was wrong but he knew something else, he knew that if it ever came out that the cash came from entities affiliated to Al Qaeda, Mulroney was toast. An ace in the hole if you will.This was a well orchestrated campaign. Schreiber found The CBC’s Fifth Estate to play with Mulroney’s nerves.Then one day Schreiber dropped the bomb with complete detachment, he had paid Mulroney three hundred thousand dollars in cash in hotels in Montreal and New York. Right after Mulroney had stated that he had no business dealings with the man, to a judge…Then even more stunning, Mulroney admitted to receiving cash from Schreiber, I just couldn’t believe my eyes. Why he would admit to that when it was his word against Schreiber’s is beyond comprehension. Then I remembered a quote from Mulroney’s PR guy, Luc Lavoie, “ Mulroney is not that stupid it’s just not him…”Right Luc, what the heck were we thinking here…At that point Schreiber clearly is on his way to saying what he tried so hard no to say. He recently admitted to a journalist that he regrets having held back the truth for so long. In another article he claims that revelations that he might make will shock Canadians, stuff they can’t even dream about…What he means of course is that the money came from terrorism affiliated accounts, Al-Qaeda is one of the beneficiaries.Now before I get back to this I would like to note that at this point CSIS is clueless, not one iota of a clue.What’s interesting here is that the transactions pre-dated the 9/11 attacks by more than seven years and Al-Qaeda’s rising public profile. So why would this be so important? After all I couldn’t find one Canadian that would believe for a second that Mulroney is a terrorist sympathizer ( sorry Mr. Arar), so why is it so significant… Peter Munk once said of Mulroney that our ex-prime minister was on first name basis with every single dictator around the world… That’s not good. But the picture gets clearer as we consider the time lines.Harper is now Prime minister and of course Mulroney a valued advisor to the minority prime minister. So Karl tightened the proverbial nuts a little tighter.Now we have a prime minister who’s most high profile advisor admitted receiving funds from an individual that drew the funds from an Al Qaeda entity - still no CSIS.Harper is set to address the Australian parliament on September the 11th to commemorate the 9/11 attacks and Mulroney is coming out with his memoirs. Yesterday a protester in Australia was arrested in a Bin Laden costume waving a Canadian flag… I wonder when Harper will visit our troops again in Afghanistan…Now you would think that Schreiber is feeling vindicated, but he isn’t. The last thing Schreiber wants the Canadians to know is that he was wheeling and dealing with Osama. Unless of course he could strike a deal where he would be immune from prosecution and would stay in Canada. No, Schreiber isn’t happy right now. Neither is Mulroney.Harper meanwhile now has to answer to the world.I wonder if Ogilvy Renault sent golf balls to Osama Bin Laden.Daniel M. Deilgat
posted by Dan Deilgat @ Friday, September 07, 2007