Mine to All Members of Canada's 44th Parliament

  

 

 

Mrs. Janice Charette

 

Clerk of the Privy Council and Secretary to the Cabinet

Privy Council Office

85 Sparks Street

Room 1000

Ottawa, Ontario

Canada

K1A 0A3

info@pco-bcp.gc.ca

 

And

 

The Honourable Anthony Rota

 

Speaker of the House for the 44^th Parliament

Office of the Speaker of the House

Speaker.President@parl.gc.ca

 

 

 

To all Members of Canada’s 44^th Parliament.

 

 

 

Thursday, June 8, 2023

 

Dear Members.

 

I am Daniel Deilgat, a self-made analyst and financial crimes investigator. The investigations that I undertook spans the better part of 30 years and focus on distinct circumstances.

 

Those are:

 

.1-      The theft of treasury of Allied Cellular Systems Ltd, a Canadian corporation that was trading on the Vancouver Stock Exchange:

 

 

Allied acquired the right to cellular systems in the US for the purpose of developing the systems and selling such assets.

 

Allied was formed after one of its undisclosed principal, Lee Gilson Lovett- a former CIA operative and a Washington DC lawyer, illegally acquired the rights to such system.

In a consent decree issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington DC, Lovett was ordered to liquidate the assets.

But before he could do that he had to develop and build the systems in order to generate value.

That is when he caused for the formation of Allied Cellular Systems Ltd.

 

Once the assets were liquidated, their book value was more than $340 million dollars US.

At least one of the officers of Allied at the time was a former Director of Communications for the Bush/Quayle Whitehouse, while another was a former transition Team director for the Bush/Quayle campaign.

 

All of whom had indirect ties at various times with the CIA and other American Intel agencies.

 

.2-      The 9/11 Attacks:

 

When in the summer of 2001 I observed an inexplicable and sudden liquidation of assets in the Isle of Man, and in various jurisdiction including the British Isles, I advised Sgt Bennington of the RCMP’s “E” Division, financial crimes unit.

         My statement was met with sarcasm and frankly humour that was bordering on personal insults, but nevertheless, an appointment was made for me to call Sgt. Fozard at 09:00 AM sharp, on Tuesday the 11^th of September 2001.

 

         That morning I realized that Bennington’s humour was at the behest of the 2,977 victims that died on that day.

         It became clear in the following days that the Allied case reached corners of dark geopolitical depths.

 

         Through request I made to the Privy Council and the office of then Prime Minister Jean Chrétien, I was met by two officers of the national security directorate of the RCMP, the very next day if my memory serves me correctly.

One of the officers seemed still shaken from the developments and stated as he walked in the door that: the “ Fuckin’ Republicans have gone mad”.

 

This would be the second time in two months that the RCMP would ignore warnings and my offer of assistance through information gathered in our files.

 

         Sources a few days after the attacks in New York, led me to follow a couple of individuals of Arab demeanour, from the Niagara-Falls Border in Canada to Toronto by bus.

         One clearly stating to the other that the knives used in the attacks had been concealed in arm rest prior to the passenger boarding. That information was never substantiated, and I have no reason to believe it to be true but, I passed the information along to the RCMP, that arrived late at the Toronto terminal and lost the two individuals.

 

         The next day I contacted an FBI agent at the American Embassy in Ottawa, he promptly set up a yahoo email and I sent him my brief.

I never heard back from them.

 

I then reached out to Senator Carl Levin in time, whom promptly began an investigation of the bank at the center of various cash transfers, Riggs Bank, colloquially known as the CIA’s bank.

 

The Senate's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations found Riggs Bank guilty and levied a record fine of 25 million dollars against the bank.

Subsequently Riggs Bank was sold to a Pittsburgh Bank.

 

This would mark the first time that we tested our investigative product and it hit the bull’s eye.

 

Eventually we were able to compose a list of individuals that took part in facilitating the transfers and we discovered that one Engelbert Schreiber Sr, a Liechtenstein banker with dubious ties with South American drug cartels, was allegedly the person that facilitated transfers of cash and direct real estate transactions to former Prime Minister of Canada, Brian Mulroney, in the Airbus matters.

From that point on, I committed time to understand better the Airbus Case.

 

 

.3- The Airbus Case and Mulroney’s ties to Isle of Man corporations:

 

For example, we believe that one Peter Michael Bond, a resident of the Isle of Man was a secretary for various entities where funds from the liquidation of my clients’ assets were laundered.

Bond was also a secretary in at least one company involved in the Yukos Oil liquidation of assets after Vladimir Putin ordered that the company be appropriated by the Russian government.

Bond’s name also appeared in the incorporation of an entity called Telluride Investments, a company that it is alleged, has invested in condominium project in Telluride Colorado, where according to journalist Stevie Cameron, Mulroney had owned an apartment at one point.

 

Peter Bond was charged in the United States and reached a deal with the Justice Department that gave him his freedom, he never went to jail.

 

Incidentally, we had provided a list of Isle of Man entities in a complaint I filed with the RCMP in 1994-95 with the details of, in part Telluride’s incorporation details, and in 2006 had provided a copy of the complaint to the CBC’s Fifth Estate at the request of the RCMP.

 

Yet I was never convinced that Mulroney and the Airbus case had anything to do with our case, or for that matter the financing of the 9/11 Attacks.

My concerns that Mulroney, in his capacity as a senior advisor to Prime Minister Stephen Harper, were serious enough that I wrote to the Prime Minister.

 

Hours later, Harper advised his caucus to not have any dealings with Brian Mulroney and he announced that he would call for a commission of inquiry in the matters.

 

That is when David Johnston defined the terms of the inquiry and on the advice of his legal team, declared the Airbus matters “well tilled-grounds”.

Counsel at the time for Johnston was Sheila R. Block of the firm Torys LLP while Navigator and Jaime Watt were hired to manage the crisis for Brian Mulroney.

 

What we didn’t know at the time, because it hadn’t happened yet, was that the fact that Johnston had dissipated the fog of Airbus, Mulroney was able to continue and quarterback the legal wranglings that involved the Isle of Man entities he had been involved in that tied into the $50 billion dollars Yukos Oil debacle.

 

Mulroney’s partner, Yves Fortier, became the lead in the arbitration process that was to settle the dispute between the shareholders of Yukos and Vladimir Putin. 

 

.4- Putting the election interference in Focus:

 

         Now comes the time to put all of this into context.

 

First, we have circumstances of dubious money laundering schemes designed by KPMG that for years, was used to defraud investors from around the world, and that facilitated the financing of the 9/11 attacks.

 

Then, and because David Johnston issued a pass to Brian Mulroney in the Airbus case, Mulroney’s firm was able to provoque the ire of Vladimir Putin, through the involvement of Yves Fortier in the arbitration process against Putin.

 

From 1995 until now, the RCMP and the government of Canada have never inquired about the circumstances I have raised, never.

Journalist of the CBC’s Fifth Estate to this day, refuse to admit or recognized that they had the wrong Schreiber all along. 

Moreover, one journalist with ties to the Communication and Security Establishment, Stevie Cameron, was a confidential informant for the RCMP while writing a book about Karlheinz Schreiber with a producer for the Fifth Estate, Harvey Cashore.

 

From the time that David Johnston, Sheila R. Block and Jaime Watt of Navigator got involved in the Airbus case, until now, where they are again re-united in the election interference matters whereas David Johnston is a Special Rapporteur, one common denominator is crystal clear, Sheila R, Block’s and her firm were in a clear conflict of interests whereas they stood to lose millions of dollars in fees if the Airbus investigation would have explored the terrorism affiliations of Mulroney.

What isn’t clear at this point is what role does Brian Mulroney have, if any, in the election interference matters.

 

Anyone with intelligence experience would tell you that this is a collection of miscalculations by the intelligence community, that might or might not have used Mulroney as a source to develop intelligence and that such laps of judgement on behalf of the various agencies, led to one distinct tragedy- the 9/11 Attacks while the second has just put the world on the verge of a nuclear conflict.

 

The non-arms length relationship of the law firm Torys LLP and David Johnston with the intelligence community raises all kinds of questions about any role David Johnston has undertaken and how he became Governor General of Canada.

 

Like Stephen Harper once quipped: I don’t know how much Johnston got paid for his work in defining the terms of the Mulroney/Schreiber inquiry, but whatever it is it wasn’t enough…

 

The reality is that Johnston and his team have failed Canadians in the Airbus inquiry and with the intelligence community, they likely will again cause another catastrophe.

 

If the intelligence community couldn’t prevent the 9/11 attacks, how are we to assume that Putin will not use his nuclear arsenal?

 

This, the 44^th Parliament is likely the last bastion of truth the world might have.

 

I will make myself available to any committee should you consider that my testimony under oath, would advance your work. 

 

Daniel M. Deilgat.

The motive of Vladimir Putin.

 

           

 

By:       Daniel M. Deilgat.

 

You wonder why there is a war in Ukraine?

Answer: Peter Michael Bond.

 

Who you ask? Bond, Peter Bond. But who is that half mythical guy? Well for one he was disqualified by the Isle of Man Supervision Commission as a director of all the shell companies he was involved in.

Peter Bond was involved in the dismantlement of Yukos Oil. 

Actually, the puppet CEO that was installed by Vladimir Putin’s cronies. Stephen Curtis see: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2004/mar/05/russia.oilandpetrol  was killed in a helicopter crash, very similar to the same circumstances that involved the accidental death of all the top managers of Trump Casinos in New Jersey. During the same period, Swiss police carried out raids on homes in Zurich and Geneva after requests from the Russian authorities to help with an investigation into the financial affairs of Yukos.

 

Mr. Curtis was made managing director of Group Menatep, which has a 61% holding in Yukos, the oil group at the centre of a struggle with Russian president Vladimir Putin.

In UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , Petitioners, HULLEY ENTERPRISES LTD., ) YUKOS UNIVERSAL LTD., and ) VETERAN PETROLEUM LTD., ) )  against respondent The Russian Federation, where  Putin tried to cancel the award the petitioners were awarded through arbitration. It wasn’t until May of 2021 that these proceedings came to a head whereas the concern the Claimants’ efforts to enforce in England high-profile arbitral awards handed down in 2014, in which the tribunal found that Russia had unlawfully expropriated the Claimants’ assets and ordered Russia to pay the Claimants approximately $50 billion in compensation (“the Awards”). The Awards are believed to be the largest arbitral awards in history.

 

Now think about this for a second, 50 Billion dollars was the award… That’s what Putin and his cronies were ordered to pay.

 

That was a problem for Putin so, why not invade Ukraine.

 

The noise around the Ukraine invasion is something along the lines that Putin was getting squeezed by his oligarch buddies. Something along the lines of an eye for an eye, where Putin would squeeze his billionaire buddies because he is on the hook for 50 Billion. That’s American dollars Vlad, not Russian Rubles.

 

Back to Bond, I came across a New York Times Journalist that had written a book about Trump not being a billionaire, Tim O’Brien at the time was looking into Bond but he was way too secretive for me, with his encrypted emails and such. He offered to come to Toronto to meet with me, I declined.

 

O’Brien was hot on the trail of Peter Bond but he had nothing that would have complemented my clients’ case.

But I always wondered why the American Justice Department struck a plea deal with Bond, so did O’Brien.

 

Lets be clear here a plea deal with Bond at the time was a plea deal with Putin.

 

I have a few conspiracy theorists friends that jump on the fact that Bond was partnered with Riggs Bank of Washington D.C, calling the bank the CIA’s bank.

 

So we looked into it and we found that in fact Riggs had laundered funds for the pilots of the 9/11 attacks through the former dictator of Chile, Augusto Pinochet.

That sent the American Senate into damage control, and they too decided they had to investigate. Senator Carl Levin of Michigan headed the investigation that relied heavily on the investigative product of O’Brien- at the New York Times, and mine.

 

Riggs was found to have laundered money for Pinochet, the wife of the Saudi Ambassador to Washington, which in turn such funds were disbursed as donations to an organization that subsidized the guys that flew the planes into the World Trade Center on September 11^th, 2001.

 

Yes you read that right, we went to the war in Ukraine and Vladimir Putin, to the 9/11 attacks. 

 

Now don’t take my word for it, look it up. Ask Timothy O’Brien, formerly of the New York Times. 

 

In the end we were right, it was strange that the American Justice Department would cut a deal with a Putin cronie.

 

What is even weirder right now is that the Justice Department has no collective recollection of these facts.

 

Meanwhile children are being killed in Ukraine so Putin can recoup his 50 billion dollars. Look for a deal between the US, England and Russia once the war in Ukraine winds down…

 

Make no mistake, Putin had kompromat on the Americans and the Brits, and that’s how and why you have the Ukraine war. That’s why civilian are being slaughtered.

 

You can also ask George Tenet…

 

 

 

Chief Justice Alban Garon’s Killing: The Movie predicting the murders.

Where is the second suspect in the Garon Murders?

Daniel Deilgat

 

 

The background that led to the murders.

 

Arthur Hailey, a best-selling author, had the misfortune of associating himself with people in Brian Mulroney’s social circle. Bruce Verchere was Brian Mulroney’s tax lawyer and, the same attorney that designed tax schemes so Hailey could avoid paying taxes by moving to the Bermudas.

 

When living in Montreal, the Hailey’s youngest daughter would babysit Verchere’s kids. It was during that period that litigation pertaining to another murder- that of Roberto Calvi, an executive with the Vatican Bank, would be entrusted to Vercheres from Ogilvy, Renaud- Mulroney’s law firm.

 

This would be a significant time for both Verchere and Mulroney, as suddenly, they would be forced to either cooperate with the Italian Mafia or be killed.

Ironically it was the money of the Catholic church that would bring Brian Mulroney, Bruce Verchere and the Mafia on a collision path with Canadian Tax laws and Alban Garon.

 

Eventually Arthur Hailey’s daughter went from being a baby sitter to Bruce Verchere’s kids to getting her pregnant with Bruce Verchere’s twins, much to the dismay of Arthur Hailey and Verchere’s wife.

 

A nasty divorced ensued, Verchere’s wife had money from having sold her law firm accounting software, 17 million to be exact. Her money was diluted in a pot of overseas companies that also included some of the commissions received by Mulroney from Engelbert Schreiber Sr., on behalf of Airbus.

 

When she couldn’t find her money, she had to gain control of the situation, fortunately, her husband committed suicide by shooting himself “twice” in the head according to the SPVM police detectives. 

 

At the time of his suicide, Verchere had just agreed to leave Hailey’s daughter and come back and live with his wife. 

Needless to say that many people close to the family suggest that Verchere’s wife and at least one of his sons would have played a role in his death.

That put Verchere’s wife in a position where she would control the estate and have access to all, of the overseas accounts that her husband had created to hide Mulroney’s money and hers from the tax man here in Canada.

 

Suddenly Mulroney had to negotiate with one pissed off wife who knew damn well that he was getting kickbacks in the Airbus case and had no problems will balck mailling him. 

On her end, Verchere’s widow suddenly had tax issues, she had to bring the money back into Canada, which she could not resolve without some sort of resolution in tax court.

 

With the aid of Alban Garon the lawyer, Brian Mulroney and his tax lawyer’s black mailing wife reached a deal that later was found to significantly disadvantage the Verchere estate. 

 

 

 

 

The Murders 

 

First and foremost a suspect was eventually apprehended in the murder of Justice Garon his wife and a family friend, and one is still on the loose. 

 

Ian Bush. Was found guilty by a jury that took less than two and a half hours to get to a verdict which included a period of a 45 minute recess for lunch…

 

No inconsistencies of evidence were ever analyzed or for that matter looked at. No records of private clients that Alban Garon had as a lawyer after he left the Tax Court either. 

In fact, these murders were sold to the public and the jury in this case as a simple home invasion gone bad. By an individual that had a bone to pick with Garon.

 

3 elderlies in their 70s bound to chairs and gaged. Beaten badly but not shot. All dead and a single credit card missing.

 

Ian Bush apparently did the same thing to a veteran over 100 years old in Ottawa. He tied him to a chair and put a plastic bag over the guy’s head and, yes, one credit card was missing…           

 

Strangely enough, Ian Bush couldn’t kill a 100 year old man with a walker, but he was able to kill three healthy elderlies in their 70s.

 

That’s what the police force of Ottawa police chief Vern White and the OPP of Commissionaire Julian Fantino would have you believe.

 

However, prior to the Ottawa police finding a suspect, I had a brief meeting some detectives of the Ottawa Police about a theory I was looking at, when they came to Toronto.

.

I was leaning towards these murders being tied to Bruce Verchere’s, widow and Brian Mulroney’s handling of their tax predicaments.

 

I pointed the Ottawa detectives in what I am sure they thought was a delusion induced conspiracy theory direction. When I walked away from that meeting, months before they even found Ian Bush, Ottawa detective surely thought I was off my rocker…

 

I gave them a DVD of the movie written years before the murders, by Arthur Hailey whereas in the movie, a serial killer ties elderlies to chairs, mutilates their bodies while they are alive and then kills them and a pattern arises where the killer is following the book of….

According to personal accounts of individuals close to Arthur Hailey, he became so distraught with the situation of his youngest daughter, and his then former tax attorney, that he buried himself in writing what would apparently be his last book. 

 

The story line in Detective is said to have been based on the personal experience of Arthur Hailey and that of his daughter, in the world of Bruce Verchere and Brian Mulroney.

 

The research, the eventual book and subsequent movie, were all developed before the murders of Aban Garon , his wife and their friend.

 

I won’t offer my opinion on why or if Ian Bush actually killed Alban Garon, but I can speculate on the fact that Ian Bush looks nothing like the composite drawing that was drawn through witness interrogations.

 

At best, Ian Bush was not alone when he killed Alban Garon and two others.

 

The Ottawa Police manipulated the evidence and suppressed the evidence that indicated that another killer was in the room. For that, Chief of Ottawa Police had a mysterious meeting in Florida which was concealed as his own wedding, and suddenly to his total surprise, he was appointed by Stephen Harper to the Senate in the same period of time that I had raise the issues.

 

Harper wasn’t done.

 

After The OPP conducted its review of the investigation of the Ottawa Police into their investigation of the Alban Garon murders, Julian Fantino was invited in the fold of the Conservative party, eventually becoming a minister.

 

I had challenged both White and Fantino directly and Prime Minister Harper conspired to shield both.

Years later, at least one other suspect is still out there. Maybe even the actual killer. 

I don't know Ian Bush and I don't think he could have killed anyone, at least not without a partner.

 

 

 View Detective here: 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=583QkHJdVmM

Assessing The Role of FINTRAC in Canada.

 

 

By:              Daniel M. Deilgat

                   Gander, 

  Newfoundland and Labrador

                   Canada.

                   Email:  danieldeilgat@icloud.com

 

FINTRAC is the financial intelligence unit that monitors monetary transactions to identify and prevent illegal activities such as money laundering and financing of terrorist organizations. The center reports to the Minister of Finance, who in turn is accountable to Parliament. FINTRAC is headquartered in Ottawa and has offices in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver.

 

The centre is headed by CEO Sarah Paquet and is a standing member of The Egmont Group.

 

The Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units is an international organization that facilitates cooperation and intelligence sharing between national financial intelligence units (FIUs) to investigate and prevent money laundering and terrorist financing. National FIUs collect information on suspicious or unusual financial activity and are responsible for processing and analyzing the information received. FIUs are normally not law enforcement agencies themselves, findings are shared with appropriate law enforcement or prosecution bodies if sufficient evidence of unlawful activity is found. The Egmont Group is headquartered in Toronto, Ontario, Canada,

 

The take away here is that FINTRAC was formed to “prevent” various forms of money laundering, terrorism financing and a whole slew of national security issues related to financing.

 

So, does FINTRAC work?

 

The short answer is no. 

 

Sure, it detects millions of small transactions and, every once in a while, it will refer matters to various government agencies like the CRA, the RCMP and others under the purview of the Justice Department but, when it counts, the math done by FINTRAC favours the criminals and not the best interests of Canadians.

 

For example, FINTRAC has a yearly budget of approximately 50 million dollars. It has just under 400 employees spread over less than ten offices. Quick math would put the costs of salaries and other related expenses at approximately 40 million dollars. Not sure about rental leases for any of its operations, nor for costs related to operating such staff and facilities but you get the picture.

By the time expenditures are paid, there is no money for investigations for all intensive purposes.

 

So, what is the calculation that guides decisions to cause for the enforcement of money laundering statutes? 

 

None. Government agencies play musical chairs with FINTRAC referrals and when the music stops, everyone gets a chair.

 

A napkin analysis would lead you to conclude that funding for these agencies is determine and allocated by whoever is in government at any given time. That  some of these key politicians are often the first ones to be compromised by the very people that FINTRAC refers to law enforcement agencies.

 

Before FINTRAC, the problem was to divert liability and deniability away from agencies like The CRA and The RCMP, and onto a more nebulous and independent entity, namely FINTRAC.

 

We saw this when Brian Mulroney cannibalized the RCMP budgets to a point that the force had to borrow money from the CRA when they served warrants for various tax centers. The Coup de Grace, Mulroney diluted the national security mandate of the serge and reduced the RCMP to a little more than cops for hire.

 

At that point I no longer wanted to join the Mounties.

 

I got involved in financial crime analysis way before FINTRAC came about. The umbrella of my mandate was multi-pronged. From law firms to casinos, arms dealers to securities fraud and theft, to political intelligence operations, mobsters to terrorists ,a world of illicit money laundering operations revealed itself and my curiosity had no bounds.

 

You would think that having FINTRAC in the tool box would be of great help, it was actually an obstacle. In fact, for every million dollars FINTRAC spends, ten million dollars is embezzled or otherwise stolen from Canadians, investors and global clients of Canadian companies.

 

It was not an accident when Brian Mulroney was nominated as the leader of the Conservative Party. 

Financed through the wealth of an international Conservative group, Mulroney’s government would eventually lay the groundwork to weaken international efforts to combat financial crimes.

 

By the time FINTRAC came about, the baby was thrown out with the bath water. 

 

Over the years countless hours of surveillance of  law firms and the development of schemes designed to provoke reactions from various governmental agencies, organizations and individuals, as well as direct infiltrations of various groups and criminal entities in what became a sting of massive proportions spanning the planet, a pattern emerged that clearly supports the implementation of schemes that were designed to counter any impact organizations like FINTRAC would have on combatting money laundering.

 

In the initial case I stumbled upon scams which led to investigations into how and why he could get away with such extraordinary criminal enterprises.

My direct involvement with international agencies involved in combatting international money laundering through consulting agreements, offered me the opportunities to be absorbed.

 

Having come full circle into the investigation, the conclusion is undeniable, substantial criminal frauds and thefts through money laundering and other mechanisms, in Canada and abroad, would not have survived legal tests would it not be for the complicit blessing of government agencies such as the RCMP, the CRA, FINTRAC and other key peripheral partners of these agencies as well as the former Prime Minister of Canada, The Right Hon. Stephen Harper. 

 

All FINTRAC has accomplished is that, various government agencies have greater access to the private information of Canadians and can better established whom it allowes to commit financial crimes and who should be prosecuted on pro forma statutes.

 

Since FINTRAC was formed, financial crimes in Canada consistently grew exponentially.

 

 

 

 01/11/22

 

Milkman’s Son: A letter to Karlheinz Schreiber

 

Note: While some individuals named herein are now deceased, the facts reduced herein should never have been ignore by a police force such as The Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

 

Dear Karlheinz.

 

Adnan Kashoogi once corrected me, when I asked him how he felt about being referred to as an arms dealer, he said, “if people call you an arms dealer, they mean murderer, but I don’t feel like a criminal.”…

 

I had to ask:” you mean that you don’t feel like a murderer?”

 

He was annoyed, he took a sip of that $10 water-that I paid for, and then  remarked that perhaps I should be arrested, for providing him a glass of water … 

 

He wasn’t done, I was to be bombarded with principles of Cognitive Dissonance…

 

You know, he said, how many people are killed each year by water or the lack of it?

Do you think that people would stop fighting if there were no guns? 

Do you accuse your priest- you’re Catholic right?, why his church spreads beliefs that inevitably lead to wars? 

Do you condemn the Catholic church for killing tens of thousands of native children in this country? – Although this conversation took place in 1992, somehow, he seemed to be aware of the circumstances…

Do you call them “Faith Dealers” as if you meant that they, like me are implied criminals?

 

Suddenly he seemed amused by his logic, or maybe it was by the look on my face.

 

He would continue,” there is no Santa Claus, so are your parents criminals for letting you believe in such ridiculous charade?”

 

He would conclude that he wanted to have this conversation for a long time. He wanted to liberate, extract that innocence from someone, but everyone he knew are mostly Muslims, and much more unsophisticated when it came to believing in something as fictitious as faith- “they wouldn’t think twice about killing anyone whom disagrees with their religious beliefs, unless they want something ”.

 

The world is a more pragmatic place because for every weapon, people like me, put in the hands of these idiots. 

 

But he was worried, he knew more about me than any government agencies, and yet that confused him. 

Clearly he knew that I was interested in the movement of funds through secret entities and, obviously, he was wondering if I was investigating his dealings.

 

As interested as he was, he relaxed when I asked him what he knew about you…

 

He actually thought that I was interested in another arms dealer called Viktor Bout- he pronounced it “boot”.  

I knew then who Bout is and frankly, I found it bizarre that he would inject a Russian arms dealer into our casual discussion.

 

He seemed eager to turn the conversation back to you, he didn’t know anything about you…

 

I told him about raw data that Kroll had shared and the FBI had corroborated  That entities he transferred funds to and from, somehow were also used by individuals with ties to the CIA, some Columbian cartels and other dubious entrepreneurs.

 

His only comment was that he needed to be more careful...

 

It wouldn’t be until 1997 that we would put you and Engelbert Schreiber Sr. into the picture.

 

 

Frankly Karlheinz, you were of no interest to our case until the RCMP in Canada decided to protect you…

 

That’s when we found out about the whole back story whereas you agreed to let media outlets like the CBC, use your name and lead everyone to believe that you had paid the commissions to Mulroney.

 

Of course, you knew all along that Pelosi never stole that money from the pot. In fact, there was no doubt in your mind that Engelbert Schreiber Sr. handled the kick backs.

 

When Pelosi got caught with the cocaine in Chicago- I believe, you had to get rid of the guy because his affiliations with drug dealers. And here you were thinking that he stole money to support his addiction…

 

When I decided to meet with your attorneys in Toronto, you just couldn’t help yourself, you had to come through the lobby to catch a glimpse of me. I appreciated that.

 

Although I knew you were in the office that day, the message I was to convey, had little to do with you, it had to do with the fact that I was about to level the playing field and provide the CBC with evidence that they had the wrong Schreiber.

 

The goal of that exercise was to see what would come next, what you would do, what the CBC would do and of course, what the RCMP would do…

 

It would have been very easy for you to just come out and state that in fact everyone had the wrong Schreiber, but you didn’t.

Harvey Cashore at the CBC’s Fifth Estate could have easily issued a retraction after I provided them with the facts, but then again, you had sued them and the RCMP had Cashore stored away so, well, that could have been messy…

The RCMP could have also corrected the record, they could have came out and just said that you were never involved however, they knew that your accountant was sharing offices with the very guy that Airbus had commissioned to pay Mulroney. They weren’t ready to do you a solid…

 

You, Harvey Cashore and the RCMP somehow came to the conclusion that it would be best to work together and let bygones be bygones. Another former journalist, Stevie Cameron, would get a cool one million dollars bonus from the RCMP through their University of New Brunswick slush fund. Jock Ferguson would get a job with Kroll Inc., certainly he was well paid for that.

 

But when we decided to test the corporate legal courage of Kroll, and tell them that we knew of their role in the investigation of the Airbus circumstances on behalf of the RCMP and the Canadian government, and of course how they were instrumental- voir liable, in aiding in the cover up, well, Jules Kroll- the Chairman of that outfit, decided he was going to help me since he figured no one would listen to me anyway.

 

Of course, by then, 9/11 happened and your secret partner Engelbert Schreiber Sr, suddenly was named in a law suit in New York State as one of the financiers of the attacks. As luck would have it, I paid close attention to that law suit because it was brought on by the family of a man I considered as one of my very few friends. As a former FBI anti terrorism agent, John helped me for years navigating the sea of terrorist financiers and national security no-nos.

Through his family’s lawsuit, I like to cherish the thought that he helped one last time.

 

There was not much room left then, and Harper had no choice, he had to clean it up so, he called for the appointment of the Oliphant commission after I asked what the government intended to do about the fact that the RCMP’s investigation into Airbus led, or otherwise facilitated the financing of the attacks.

One might think that my claims were a little over-the-top but Adnan might beg to differ…

 

Karlheinz, I don’t know that you, or for that matter Mulroney, are terrorists sympathizers, but I did put weapons in your hands and let time and facts take their courses... 

 

I suspect that you read this blog and that your health is fading, I just want to make sure that when you die, you will know that I figured it out.

 

While that might make me a criminal, Adnan would be proud that his lesson wasn’t in vain. 

Daniel M. Deilgat.