Election 2021 Canada: Takin' Care Of Business

At 57 years of age, I decided that this time, I would rely on what I've learned over the years and see if I should vote.

The last time I inadvertently researched any politicians I found that Pierre Elliot Trudeau had a summer job- years before, in a gold mine in Malartic, Quebec. 

Coming from an extended family where the patriarch of the brood worked all of his life in a gold mine, I automatically had respect for the guy..

That was the last time that I ever had respect for a Federal political leader.

Back then, leaders had balls between their legs but now, well, they have accolades up their asses. 

It meant something when a politician said that he did something for Canadians, it seemed like all Canadians won when that happened. 

Perhaps the most significant of these accomplishments came when Canadians were offered the protection of medicare for all. Canadian no longer had to worry about losing loved ones because they couldn't afford the costs of taking care of each other. It meant something positive for all Canadians not just the ones that voted for one political party.

But it isn't like that anymore.

A week ago I attended a candidate debate in Gander, Newfoundland. The Liberal candidate and incumbent is Scott Simms. His Conservative opponents is a guy called Clifford Small. The NDP guy didn't bother to show up so I won't bore you with his name.

I tried to talk to Scott Simms on a few occasions but he never gave me the benefit of a reply or acknowledgment for that matter. I called Clifford Small but I got his answering machine and it was full.

However, about two hours later, my phone rand and sure enough, Mr. Small was calling me back although I never left him a message...

Immediately I was reminded of when politicians actually got involved with their constituents, he showed me right there that action speaks louder than words. I told him that I would be at the debate, and for the first time in my life, I actually sat down and allowed myself to be immersed in bull shit.

The debate was polite, clean as it can be- Small actually referred to Simms as a good Member of Parliament. How about that?

That very statement showed me that Small isn't afraid to respect his fellow Canadians.

That was stunning when you consider that just a few weeks ago, the Liberals weren't sure if Simms was the right candidate for them in Gander... Liberals are concerned with the fact that Simms doesn't engage enough with his constituents. Another point of contention for the party is that Simms voted in the past to support the legitimacy of hate speech against the Liberal caucus. Simms also sided with anti-abortion interests in an other vote.

All in all, Simms is as unpredictable as he is irrational. Both of these traits are synonymous with individual suffering from convenient instincts. In comparison,  persons that deals in truth and respect, are predictable and logical.

In politics now, there are very few selfless individuals such as the likes of Clifford Small. 

I wrote to Scott Simms to address issues of security and law enforcement. The case load I curated over the last 30 years of my life as an information analyst, relates to financial crimes whereas billions of dollars were stolen from unsuspecting Canadians, and people around the world, through a few Canadian companies. The number is well north of 35 billion dollars all together.

The government agencies mandated to protect Canadians from such crimes are non-responsive because most of these circumstances involve one man, Brian Mulroney.

Earlier I wrote about accolades and given what I learned throughout my years as a financial crimes analyst, Canadian politics are contaminated with dangerous special interests that are adverse to Canadian values and human rights.

If you want to vote in this election you need to look at the friends and associates of our politicians. At the individuals that give them money and you must decide if this is in your best interests or if this is an attacks on every Canadian sovereignty.

My files over the years have been shared with the RCMP and just about every member of parliament since the days of Jean Chretien. At no time has anyone in government or law enforcement has ever disputed the claims that were set forth, not even Brian Mulroney, instead they hid.

Throughout the years I travelled the world to acquire documents and statements. I started before the internet was even out there. I talked to government officials, journalists, lawyers involved in money laundering schemes, bankers, terrorist sympathizers as well as terrorist financiers. 

I infiltrated organizations such as mafia organizations, Asian drug cartels, banks and investment firms and yes, even the RCMP here in Canada, all of which is documented and evidenced. 

I had sources within the FBI, the CIA and NSA as well as various defence inteligence agencies in Canada and abroad.

The Canadian government is aware of all this and it is likely that they have extensive surveillance on my role in these circumstances. 

This being said, The Mulroney financial syndicate, over the years, has reached groups involved in organize crime money laundering. From the Catholic Church to Al Quaeda bankers in Liechtenstein, through the financing of known convicted criminals, Mulroney cultivated a complex web of relations designed to reward those who helped him skirt the law in the Airbus case by giving jobs to former RCMP investigators and American military brass. He even got his own son Ben, to Chair a bogus mental health charity financed by Pokerstars parent company, Amaya Gaming of Montreal a company that to this day operates illegally in hundreds of jurisdictions around the world, including Canada.

Mulroney even had a likely role in twarting Interpol warrants to facilitate the entry of fugitives into Canada at the behest of the United States.

The RCMP has evidence that Mulroney's Airbus bribes were handled by a banker with direct ties to Al Qaeda and the financing off the high jackers of the 9/11 attacks. The irony in all of this is that this information came from the RCMP and some of its contractors, we never developed that evidence.

Our organize crime files led us to the last Provincial election in Ontario and the financial support of the Ford Campaign by organize crime organizations with ties to Brian Mulroney. His daughter eventually became, if you can believe that, Attorney General of Ontario in the Ford government. There are no allegations of any wrong doing by Mulroney's daughter, however, the incestuous relationships of her father span a timeline that goes all the way back to the time when he sought the nomination of the party in Winnipeg to her appointment as Attorney General of Ontario.

For those who keep time records, that is almost 38 years ago and that establishes a pattern.

From Justin Trudeau's wife being dressed by Brian Mulroney's daughter in law- wife of Ben, to the relationships that Mulroney nurtured with elements of organized crime, nothing is more notable than the fact that every prime minister since Pierre Elliot Trudeau- to the exceptions of Joe Clark and Stephen Harper, came from the same special interest.

Trudeau, Chretien, Mulroney and Paul Martin all worked or otherwise through marriage and business deals, have a direct relationship with the venerable Des Marais family patriarch, Paul Des Marais.

I can't vote for anyone with such extensive criminal ties and pretend that it is all right, and frankly most Canadians should know that in here, is the irrefutable fact that Canada has been ruled by an organized political family for whom criminal activities over the years is a means to an end.

My hypocrisy only goes so far.

Your Coincidence or Mine...The Fifth Estate's Gish gallop and the RCMP's election manipulation.

This post has been updated following the development of evidence in the election interference matters to be addressed by Justice Marie-Josée Hogue. Saturday, the 9th of September, 2023.

Isaac Asimov once claimed that people are entirely too disbelieving of coincidence. They are far too ready to dismiss it and to build arcane structures of extremely rickety substance in order to avoid it. I, on the other hand, see coincidence everywhere as an inevitable consequence of the laws of probability, according to which having no unusual coincidence is far more unusual than any coincidence could possibly be.

Coincidences are not only a state of mind that individuals will surrender to when no rational explanation is immediately available , they are a convenient tool to sow doubt. 

They are the product of one’s inabilities and/or unwillingness to comprehend how certain circumstances come about.

Sort of a deniable one legged strut.

Life from a newborn's perspective, begins with a continual flow of what appears to be coincidences. Sights, sounds and these characters, how they interact with an apparent purpose of convenience. These observations fill the first moments of life of every human beings, and are the first forms of events that begin as coincidences, that every child rationalizes and accepts as reality, evidence and facts, eventually. 

As children adventure further into life, survival priorities take precedent over the degree of legitimacy we are willing to live with. Suddenly, a child will try to manipulate his mother's conclusions using coincidences as a defence. For example, although the child was alone in the kitchen, he'll imply that it is merely a coincidence that cookies are missing out of the proverbial cookie jar. Just like that, we betray our honesty for the sake of self preservation.

We turn on its head the very abilities that enabled us to appreciate and understand life. We abandon  real integrity for an alternative reality where we argue the validity of our honesty, and force others to prove us wrong...

Clamouring coincidences is often how we prevent others from discovering the facts, the truth. It becomes a way of life, a disease that if left un-checked, affirms the anecdote of one’s life.

For example, a suspect in a criminal case might suggest that a series of unrelated events, out of his or her control, would establish their innocence- often alleged in pseudo- ignorance pleas, if only for the fact that they could not reasonably foresee and avoid the  implications that led to a perceived criminal result. 

This is usually followed by a Gish gallop defence-an erratic technique in which a debater attempts to overwhelm an opponent by excessive number of arguments, without regards for the accuracy or strength of those arguments.

Disentangling such predicaments requires motivation, it requires understanding and commitment, and it can take a long time, a lifetime sometimes...

That’s where I come in and break down the circumstances that will lead any reasonable individual to question the integrity of the CBC's News Journal The Fifth Estate and, more precisely investigative reporter and producer Harvey Cashore.

Let's break it down.

Claim #1: Cashore claims at a lecture for investigative journalist students,  that he first was made aware of the Airbus/Mulroney bribery case by happenstance and in part, through discussions with former Fifth Estate reporter Jock Ferguson- whom eventually broke the story, and Stevie Cameron, a former journalist and anchor for the Fifth Estate.

Truth #1: According to journalist Lucy Komisar, a New York City relative of a CBC News executive first contacted the CBC following claims obtained through leaked statements from an investigative product produced then by Kroll Inc., a juggernaut in the private investigator industry at the times. I contacted Kroll's New York offices once it became clear that, the very journalist that Cashore claimed had sensitized him to the Airbus case, was now working for Kroll's Florida operations- an American company with a Canadian subsidiary that did consulting work for both, the Canadian Government and The RCMP. Soon after my call, Ferguson either resigned or was let go.

Claim #2: Cashore claimed that he found nothing in our files on Isle of Man entities that we provided to him and the CBC's Fifth Estate, at the suggestion of the Vancouver detachment of The RCMP.

Truth #2: According to Stevie Cameron, the research that she and Harvey Cashore did for the book they co-authored, " The Last Amigos", they were aware that Brian Mulroney owned and/or was otherwise involved in the development of condominiums in Telluride Colorado through offshore entities but, they could not link the ownership of the condo, to Isle of Man companies they researched or were otherwise aware of. Now this is surely understandable but, The RCMP was well aware of that fact through the files we had provided to them in 1995, that they returned to us for the purpose of sharing the information with the CBC's fifth Estate. The RCMP was then motivated to work with Cashore and Cameron in order to suppress such information to go public. Cashore and Cameron met in a hotel room at least once, with RCMP Inspectors to discuss the Airbus file, and that is when The CBC, Cashore and Cameron abandoned journalism and deliberately fed the Canadian public half-truths. Stevie Cameron admitted that she became a confidential informant and Harvey Cashore, by association, a co-conspirator in sharing information with the police and, omitting parts of the story willingly and presumably, at the insistence of The RCMP. My contact at The RCMP in Vancouver was well aware of the role of the named Teluride Isle of Man entity in the Airbus case, I wasn't at the time. In fact, when I began questioning the intentions of The RCMP to refuse to take on my clients' case to protect their Airbus case, that is when it was suggested that I provide the file to the CBC. Promptly The RCMP send me the files we had provided in our 1995 complaint. and I provided them to Cashore. These files are posted in part in this blog. 

The auditors of my clients' company were KPMG as evidenced in the documents provided to the CBC.

Claim #3: Stevie Cameron testified in front of the Ethics Committee that she had no conversation with anyone pertaining to the Airbus case before her testimony. 

Truth #3: Both the Chair of the committee and I, as well as a few members of the committee, had written and verbal communications at length, of my conversations with Stevie Cameron in the weeks that led to her testimony. I told Stevie Cameron that they had the wrong Schreiber, that the funds used to pay bribes to Mulroney came from dubious Isle of Man Companies with ties to terrorism financing. Cameron claimed that she would have to dust off her files on the case in her basement to find these Isle of Man documents, but she never testified to such. Stevie Cameron was eventually handed one million dollars from The RCMP and went back to work on another project that was also of particular interest to The RCMP, the case of the missing prostitutes in Vancouver. The RCMP had a vested interest in suppressing the fact that their Vancouver Heroin Squad knew for years of the disappearances of these young women, they used Stevie Cameron to suppress these facts and control the story.

Soon after Harvey Cashore published a book on the matters entitled, "The Truth Shows Up".

In 2021, Harvey Cashore again is producing reports about KPMG schemes to launder money. Again, the Cashore reports are misleading, grossly inaccurate but flattering to The RCMP.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/kpmg-emails-denial-shell-companies-isle-of-man-1.5998374

Soon to follow was a half baked exposé about schools built or not built by the WE Charity in Africa. A crafted report designed to attack the charity, that failed to explore both sides of the issue. 

As a Commission of inquiry has begun in the election interference matters, Cashore, The Fifth Estate and to a certain extent The RCMP, have remained  coincidentally silent. 

The damage to the Trudeau government was already done, the WE story had already manipulated public opinion and The RCMP was once again in control of who gets elected in Canada.

At least one law firm with ties to The RCMP had caused for a Chinese client to compromise Trudeau by designing a scheme whereas financial donations to The Trudeau Foundation could and would later be used against the Prime Minister.  

Now ask yourselves, should you believe what The RCMP, The Fifth Estate and Harvey Cashore are investigating, or is Harvey Cashore producing reports to conceal election interference and mitigate the liabilities The RCMP might incur?

Brian Mulroney needs to give answers that only Schreiber has

 

SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2008

Brian Mulroney needs to give answers that only Schreiber has

Friday, September 07, 2007

By: Daniel M. Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario

Is Brian Mulroney victim of the machinations and manipulations of a desperate man?There’s nothing I despise more than having to defend someone who doesn’t deserve it. But let that be a reminder to those who will read this, if a cold blooded murderer can have children and truly loved them then there must be something good deep inside that man, something worth respecting.Mulroney’s problem has always been greed. Money drove his life and was the architect of his dreams. His personal wealth was always first, Canada, I presume, might have come in third after his family but in the end, money was everything he needed the rest was a bi-product of his wallet and the generosity of those who‘s needs Mulroney was in a position to advance.That brings in Karlheinz Schreiber, a man who’s job it was to indiscriminately shower the right people with cash. Mulroney was in the right place at the right time, it was a marriage made in… the bank.Schreiber is a reputed arms dealer and the sharpest tool in the shed. He said it himself, he might be ugly but he’s not stupid.I remember sitting behind Schreiber in a Toronto court looking at him smiling in an approving manner at the judge from his seat, as if he understood exactly why these lawyers were arguing over some futile circumstances that were really a misunderstanding. He looked like the father who would let the children argue until they realized that they wasted their time.Schreiber and his wife attending court as if it was Sunday morning church, kids in tow and dressed to the nines.I remembered thinking just how surreal this all looked. Here is a man on trial in a deportation hearing for bringing down the government of Chancellor Kohl, a man that sold tanks to the Saudis and had direct connections with Saddam Hussein and Al-Qaeda. I couldn’t help looking at his wife and wondering how someone so Christian looking could be with a man who’s product kills children an innocent civilians by the thousand.I had a hard time focusing on the debate in front of me, all I could remember is Eddie Greenspan going on and on about a book. Greenspan was fixated with this book, every reply was this book this, that book that…Of course he was talking about Stevie Cameron’s book, The Last Amigo, a book she co-authored with a producer of CBC’s Fifth Estate, Harvey Cashore. Greenspan was right to question the crown’s quote taken right out of the book, Greenspan knew the book was wrong but he knew something else, he knew that if it ever came out that the cash came from entities affiliated to Al Qaeda, Mulroney was toast. An ace in the hole if you will.This was a well orchestrated campaign. Schreiber found The CBC’s Fifth Estate to play with Mulroney’s nerves.Then one day Schreiber dropped the bomb with complete detachment, he had paid Mulroney three hundred thousand dollars in cash in hotels in Montreal and New York. Right after Mulroney had stated that he had no business dealings with the man, to a judge…Then even more stunning, Mulroney admitted to receiving cash from Schreiber, I just couldn’t believe my eyes. Why he would admit to that when it was his word against Schreiber’s is beyond comprehension. Then I remembered a quote from Mulroney’s PR guy, Luc Lavoie, “ Mulroney is not that stupid it’s just not him…”Right Luc, what the heck were we thinking here…At that point Schreiber clearly is on his way to saying what he tried so hard no to say. He recently admitted to a journalist that he regrets having held back the truth for so long. In another article he claims that revelations that he might make will shock Canadians, stuff they can’t even dream about…What he means of course is that the money came from terrorism affiliated accounts, Al-Qaeda is one of the beneficiaries.Now before I get back to this I would like to note that at this point CSIS is clueless, not one iota of a clue.What’s interesting here is that the transactions pre-dated the 9/11 attacks by more than seven years and Al-Qaeda’s rising public profile. So why would this be so important? After all I couldn’t find one Canadian that would believe for a second that Mulroney is a terrorist sympathizer ( sorry Mr. Arar), so why is it so significant… Peter Munk once said of Mulroney that our ex-prime minister was on first name basis with every single dictator around the world… That’s not good. But the picture gets clearer as we consider the time lines.Harper is now Prime minister and of course Mulroney a valued advisor to the minority prime minister. So Karl tightened the proverbial nuts a little tighter.Now we have a prime minister who’s most high profile advisor admitted receiving funds from an individual that drew the funds from an Al Qaeda entity - still no CSIS.Harper is set to address the Australian parliament on September the 11th to commemorate the 9/11 attacks and Mulroney is coming out with his memoirs. Yesterday a protester in Australia was arrested in a Bin Laden costume waving a Canadian flag… I wonder when Harper will visit our troops again in Afghanistan…Now you would think that Schreiber is feeling vindicated, but he isn’t. The last thing Schreiber wants the Canadians to know is that he was wheeling and dealing with Osama. Unless of course he could strike a deal where he would be immune from prosecution and would stay in Canada. No, Schreiber isn’t happy right now. Neither is Mulroney.Harper meanwhile now has to answer to the world.I wonder if Ogilvy Renault sent golf balls to Osama Bin Laden.Daniel M. Deilgat
posted by Dan Deilgat @ Friday, September 07, 2007

The Emperor has no clothes

 

SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2008

The Emperor has no clothes

Sunday, July 08, 2007

William Elliot has his work cut out, not to mention a potential conflict of interest… something only a lawyer could appreciate

Daniel Deilgat
Toronto, Ontario
Dandeilgat@yahoo.ca

In the last thirty years of my life I have dealt with police officers in at least five different countries. In South America you can walk right out of jail for the right amount of money while in Britain they will kill you with kindness. In the United States, the FBI took professionalism to unusual heights, sometimes unable to receive complaints from the general population unless formulated in legal jargon often lost on regular individuals, who would rather simply understand that something is wrong rather than breakdown the various infractions in point form. But to their credit and especially since 9/11, the FBI started paying attention to civilians that had something to say, sometimes…But no matter where you are in the world, no matter which police force, lawyers are the enemy. Lawyers are to police officers what oppression is to the rule of law. In some jurisdiction being a lawyer is not something one would brag about without running the risk of being shot.For the past thirty years I excelled at breaking rules. I turned down the opportunity to become an RCMP officer when I was seventeen years old, I wanted to get things done without the burden of lawyering every single steps. An affidavit does little for a twelve year old girl killed by her older brother at her father’s request because her uncle, her father’s brother, raped her and therefore, brought disrepute to the family name.For those of you who think that this might be an extraordinary case think again, this happens regularly right now in Turkey, as I write this, odds are that a young woman, even a child in Turkey, is likely to be murdered for being a victim of sexual aggression.Where are the police you might wonder. They are right there picking up the pieces, powerless with authority granted by their government whom would rather turn a blind eye than to loose an election or worst, get thrown out of power by Muslim interest groups that believe that this little girl was wrong, simply because she was born an attractive woman.The police is influenced by politics and politicians, lawyers for the most part.Then in Canada there is the venerable RCMP, soon to be run and fixed by, a lawyer…Since 1991, I have been at odds with the RCMP in two specific investigations that I was involved in. One was the disappearance of a young girl that had migrated to British Columbia and got in trouble with Heroin dealers while the other was a theft case that saw more than three hundred million dollars worth of cash and assets swept from right under the nose of the lawyers that were hired to protect the assets of the company.While on the one hand the RCMP was very interested in developing the contacts I had initiated with the Heroin importers, they weren’t ready to waste years of investigating work that developed information about the drug cartel by looking into why so many prostitutes were missing.While Pickton might have had nothing to do with the cartel, the girls by their very predicament and drug use, created an unexpected opportunity to investigate early allegations of murder, allegations that were ignored because, there might have been a risk of exposing informants that were providing intelligence on the cartel. That would have had a catastrophic impact on the budget of the Heroin squad whereas years of intelligence gathering would have been wasted on prostitutes and drug addicts.There was no one who took the decision to turn a blind eye on the Pickton murders, there was never any clear allegations formulated to officers of the RCMP, no, just the need to focus on the acquisition of information. That women were disappearing was all but a trivial tidbit of information, a distraction from the information gathering role that needed to focus on the heroin commerce.For my part I had never discuss the issue with any RCMP officers because I didn’t know at the time about the allegations but, I did hear about individuals being fed to pigs because they posed a risk to the cartel. It wasn’t until the Pickton case became public that I developed concerns over what the RCMP might have known about the disappearance and/or Pickton himself.I abandoned the disappearance case when I decided to investigate a securities theft of in excess of three hundred million dollars.Allied Cellular Systems Ltd., was a Canadian public entity that had raised close to four million dollars on the Vancouver Stock Exchange to purchase rights to operate cellular telephone networks in the United States.Allied purchased or otherwise obtained rights to operate fifteen cellular systems for less than three million dollars. The licences’ value exploded and, once the systems were built and operational, the assets were worth in excess of three hundred million dollars.Management of the company concealed the true value of the assets and arranged for the sale of the assets to be paid to entities that were incorporated overseas, mostly located in the Isle of Man.The accounts in England and the Cayman Islands were operated by individuals with direct ties to the CIA.The case eventually stagnated until June of 2001 when suddenly all the assets managed by the group were being liquidated for no obvious reasons. By that time more than eight billion dollars was being “ managed” by the various individuals however, one of these individuals, namely Peter Bond of the then Riggs-Valmet, was granted immunity by the Justice Department in the United States in an irrelevant bankruptcy case involving a fly by night broker by the name of Brennan.In August of 2001, I contacted the Prime Minister’s office, insisting that the RCMP re-consider the complaint I had filed in 1994 on behalf of the shareholders. Eventually the Vancouver detachment of the RCMP was contacted by the Prime Minister’s office and a discussion ensued between Officer in charge Bennington and myself. Bennington concluded that there was enough serious circumstances to appoint an investigator and a meeting was agreed upon to further discuss the issues, the date was set for Tuesday the 11th of September 2001, I was to talk to Sgt. Fozard.On September the 11th, I advised both the RCMP and the Prime Minster that we had information about the financing of the attacks and the RCMP ignored the request to receive the allegations.The FBI on the other hand paid attention and four years later arrested a man in New York state that had recruited eighteen young Canadians for the purpose of conducting attacks on Canadian soil.Our files also helped the families of 9/11 victims disqualify Dr. Henry Kissinger from being appointed co-chair of the 9/11 commission and, in separate matters, exposed Riggs Bank in a money laundering scheme that identified General Augusto Pinochet and Saudi Ambassador to the United States, Mr. Bandar and his wife.Riggs Bank was fined a record twenty five million dollars and was sold. Augusto Pinochet was to be brought back to court in his native Chile before he past away and as I write this, the Justice Department is investigating Prince Bandar for having received in excess of twenty million dollars from a British Arms Manufacturer, BAE. All transactions went through Riggs Bank and a slew of shell companies in the Isle of Man and elsewhere, that were managed by Peter Bond, the same guy that was granted immunity by the Justice department a few years back.My job was done.The RCMP on the other hand failed to investigate a theft of in excess of three hundred million dollars U.S.From 1994 until August of 2001, the RCMP had the opportunity to act and protect the interests of a Canadian company but they decided against it. As a result, the group of individuals that operated the Isle of Man Schemes thrived and were out of control. Funds from Isle of Man accounts went through the Royal Bank of Scotland and out through ATM machines in the United States from accounts belonging to the individuals that conducted the worst attack on American soil.These Isle of Man accounts were also used as financial incubators for various slush funds. Some of the proceeds from the Isle of Man accounts were ear marked for Canadian politicians, namely Brian Mulroney, for his role in facilitating the purchase of Airbus aircrafts from Airbus Industries while he was still in office as Prime Minister of Canada.Another allegation that the RCMP refused to explore.Now, the Canadian government his proposing to fix the RCMP by appointing a man, a civilian and a lawyer, that owes his career to the very people that should be under investigation. The very people affiliated with entities and bank accounts directly related to the financing of the 9/11 attacks.If this government cannot appreciate the need for a Royal Commission to investigate the role of political influence on the RCMP and what it has incurred in the last ten years, perhaps this government is intent on obstructing justice by appointing one of their own to subdue the officers of the RCMP.Through and because of his political affiliations, William Elliot is in a situation whereas he might be deemed to be in a conflict of interests and, in his role as Commissioner of the RCMP, he could hardly do anything but obstruct justice unless he compels the ressources of the RCMP to investigate politically charged cases that center around his old bosses and the murders of many innocent victims.Otherwise we might as well be in Turkey.
posted by Dan Deilgat @ Sunday, July 08, 2007