Epstein and the Weaponization of the SARS-CoV-2 virus

 

 

The following is an abstract of an investigation that spans the better part of the last 36 years.

It is a case whereas following the money became a GPS into a world where despicable actions are the norm and decency is a handicap.

 

Here we go.

 

 

The Conditions guiding our analysis:

 

 

Causal connection

 

A causal connection is a legal term that refers to the link between a person's action and a resulting outcome.

 

Discoverable causal connection

 

A discoverable causal connection refers to a data-driven, actionable link between a cause and an effect that can be identified from observational data without requiring controlled, experimental interventions. It is a fundamental concept in data science, artificial intelligence, and legal analysis, aiming to move beyond mere correlation to identify true causal structures.

 

Synchronicity

 

 

Shared interests that are linked by coincidences often fall under the concept of synchronicity, to connect people through unexpected commonalities or rare, shared interests.

 

The Investigation:

 

What began in 1990 as a simple audit of assets for a public company, grew exponentially into an international money laundering case, terrorism financing, murders sanctioned under national security conditions, cover up of terrorism attacks as well as politically motivated biological attacks.

 

In 2016, some banks involved in our original case re-surfaced. These banks were handling funds for Jeffrey Epstein and Russian interests that had an indirect relation to our case. Part of these investments were handled through Canadian investment banks.

 

Initially we ignored the data while committing it to memory. But as events unfolded and public dissemination became more focused, comparing our confidential data with open source information available, a structure began forming, that’s when we could no longer ignore the possibility that Covid-19 had been intentionally weaponized.

 

In September of 2020 I wrote to The National Institute of Health-the NIH, in Washington D.C., advising that we had reasons to believe that the SARS pandemic was likely weaponized.

Our concerns were forwarded to investigative scientists, according to Barbara Mulach.

 

It wasn’t until the Epstein files were released by the DOJ that we were able to sharpen a causal connection through Synchronicity.

 

Then came the part of the chemical evidence.

 

The chemicals allegedly used are similar to forever chemicals, as they do not dissolve in nature. Which means that as this is written, those chemicals- or the presence of augmented levels, from 2017 to now, are still present in sewers systems, bodies of water and even crop field around the world.

They also augment the risks of breast cancers.

 

The evidence is literally under our proverbial noses.

 

Now about the witness’.

 

You’d be hard-pressed to find one scientist that would stick is head out and substantiate these claims, but that isn’t what is telling, but rather the fact that none of those we have interacted with so far have disputed the claims.

In fact, we provided two letters to The RCMP in Canada, whereas seemingly confidential sources have identified a means of the weaponization and the Russian banks involved.

It is an unsubstantiated claim that chemicals were introduced into Rape seed/Canola crops, effectively contaminating the food supply. We assume that Canadian authorities are investigating.

 

Concurrently, a group of scientists and military officers have been killed or disappeared lately, whom some, allegedly, had direct ties to Jeffrey Epstein.

 

In our assessment of the risks we have undertaken, we considered the risk to witnesses, ourselves and the greater good of societies across the planet.

The preliminary conclusion is that direct witness’ will be the initial targets while our involvement will likely become an anecdote of history.

If we are fortunate, the matters will be addressed.

 

Conclusion:

 

One key witness is sitting in a Florida prison right now, Ghyslaine Maxwell. Her notoriety is likely was has kept her alive so far, that and what Trump is afraid of, like does she have evidence that could establish that he had a role in the weaponization of Covid, and/or can the United States be held liable for the genocide of more than 7 million people, or both.

 

In the 50’s the American Navy contaminated the population of San Francisco deliberately through an aerosolization operation called Sea Spray , as such you can forget the likelihood of conspiracy theories, it did happen, it is possible and that puts the weaponization of Covid front and center.

 

While we are privy to investment evidence that isn’t public, it can be publicly ascertained through a search of public transactions in various technology companies, as well as vaccines manufacturers, that associates of Epstein have invested in tech that can create viruses, and then, invested in pharmaceutical companies that created Covid vaccines.

 

In essence, weaponizing a virus for the purposes of profitability.

 

If we do not acknowledge this and take immediate action the last thing you need to worry about is the future.

 

Daniel M. Deilgat.