Director of the Office of Scientific Coordination
and Program Operations in DMID
VIA EMAIL
In September of 2020 I reached out to the NIH to address concerns regarding the weaponization of SARS CoV-2.
In my communication with Dr. Emily Erbelding, Director of the Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (DMID) at NIAID, I claimed the following:
"We considered that such contamination could be exploited for the purpose of weaponizing chemical and/or biological compounds."
When I say we, I am including various scientists with whom I had informal discussions with over the years, that did not wish to speak on record for various reasons.
As I reluctantly continued my research between financial transactions and the virus' timeline, I became aware that a synthetic chemical- a group of Nitro-musks and polycyclic musks had the effect of enhancing the binding of SARS CoV-2 proteins.
Nitro-musks are used in perfumes, and both Elon Musk and Donald Trump released their own lines of perfumes after the pandemic, almost as if to imply that they couldn't have had anything to do with the weaponization since their perfumes were released after the pandemic.
Since September of 2020 I withheld communicating with the NIH because frankly, I thought there is no way I am on the right track- as it often happens in complex investigations.
I will not imply to offer a qualified opinion on the matters as I am not a scientists by any stretch of the imagination however, I can communicate with scientists and I did.
As you can imagine, most individuals I talk to in the science community, once they established that my half baked theories might actually have some value, tend to agree with the wide principles I advanced but, at no time would they risk their job security for some alleged crack pot like me, no matter how accurate I might be.
They would rather keep their job at the behest of seven million people or more, whom, it must be said, are already dead...
While the NIH and NIAI can argue that over time, it did more good than bad, cowering for the sake of self preservation has become a liability for the population of America and indeed the world.
Since my initial communication and your reply, almost five years have gone by, and seemingly, we are not publicly closer to a determination on the weaponization and deployment of SARS CoV-2.
Thus, I must conclude that indeed, the NIAID either lends no credibility to my claims or it would rather prepare for another pandemic than preventing one.
Evidence of the Nitro-musks and polycyclic chemicals is in every body of water in America, indeed around the world.
Thousand of sewers tests that took place before, during and after the pandemic demonstrate an unusual peak of those synthetic chemicals.
Your own research show that Nitro-musk infect breast milk and cause breast cancer. Then again, your own publications point to a rise in breast cancer during and after the pandemic.
The political climate in America right now is parallel to the need to conceal evidence of weaponization.
In Canada, the Department of Justice has received my complaints and allegations of weaponization of the virus clearly stating- under the penalty of perjury that, Elon Musk, Donald Trump and others to be named, have played and direct role in the deliberate weaponization and deployment of chemicals that enhance the binding capabilities of Covid-19.
The DOJ in Washington was also advised with the warning that AG Pam Bondi could be in a position of treason.
An Ad-hoc advisor to Peter Thiel and Elon Musk, Curtis Yarvin, has made no secret that this group of individuals have been trying to develop a means to rebrand genocide into a morally acceptable ideal for the sake of purging unwanted groups of individuals.
All of the above is public information available against private information that my investigation curated over the years.
The Federal Reserve has financial records to support most of the evidence that is alleged privately and publicly in some cases.
I am aware that the FBI and several intelligence agencies in the United States are familiar with my claims and are deliberately smothering the evidence they considered.
While my efforts to bring to justice the claims I have advanced, both in the United States and Canada, might be uncomfortable to consider, are dismissed as conspiratorial officially but too dangerous under the national security act to follow up on.
While millions have died, the cycle we observed so far is that every eight years the virus gets more potent and more people die.
In 2028 we will find out if there will even be an election in the USA.
In the meantime, the scientific community needs to put on some fighting boots and walk the science.
Respectfully.
Daniel M. Deilgat
No comments:
Post a Comment