Patterns.
The following is about the elephant in the room, and those who have compromising patterns supporting the weaponization of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Here are whom benefitted from the pandemic, the numbers and how they need to conceal that after killing over 7 million people.
Elon Musk:
- In early 2020 Musk was worth somewhere around 25 to 27 Billions
- During/After the Initial Pandemic Surge (2020–2021): his net worth jumped roughly 600% to 1,000% during the pandemic, reaching approximately $170 billion to $270 billion by late 2021.
- By 2026, his fortune continued to expand, crossing the $1 trillion mark
In 6 years his net worth grew from $25 billion to $1 Trillion, mostly based on Voodoo valuations of his companies- which has been a recurring theme throughout his life, and the resurgence of Artificial Intelligence.
From being removed as CEO of PayPal after it was found that a backdoor in the software could easily compromise customers' bank accounts, and lying to investors, to, for all practical purposes being forced out of Open AI when Musk was asking for full control over the non-profit, one constant was always resurfacing, and that is the need for Musk to have bigger lies to hide what he couldn't deliver...
Musk understood one thing about raising capital and that is, the more investors would sink into his projects, the less likely they would pull the plug and carry the losses. That combined with timely, exaggerated projections, Musk enabled his investors to recoup their money along with handsome profits before everything will come crashing down.
Peter Thiel:
- Before the pandemic (2019): Forbes estimated Peter Thiel's net worth at $2.3 billion (though leaked records highlighted that his tax-free Roth IRA alone was valued at around $5 billion at the time).
-2020 (Pandemic Surge): Thiel’s wealth jumped significantly (surging over 113% in 2020 alone) as Palantir closed major government and corporate Covid-19-related contracts and went public in September 2020.
- In the summer of 2021 Peter Thiel served as a Confidential Human Source (CHS) for the FBI.
Only one condition needed to be observed, Thiel could not report on any activities that involved Donald Trump.
- In 2026 His total fortune has expanded to nearly $38 billion, boosted by Palantir's soaring stock value and early venture holdings like SpaceX.
Open AI:
- Before the COVID-19 pandemic, OpenAI was valued at roughly $1 billion, heavily marked by Microsoft's initial $1 billion strategic investment in July 2019.
-During the pandemic era:
| Mid-Pandemic | April 2021 | $14 Billion | Early commercialization of GPT models; secondary share sales. |
| Post-Pandemic | January 2023 | $29 Billion | Followed the historic November 2022 public launch of ChatGPT. |
Since the pandemic:
| Post-Pandemic | Late 2024 | $157 Billion | Massive scaling phase and enterprise subscription growth. |
| Current Era | March 2026 | $852 Billion | Closed a record-breaking $122 billion capital round backed by Nvidia, SoftBank, and Amazon. |
| Current Era | Late 2026 | $1.25 Trillion | Target valuation for its upcoming private funding round. |
NVIDIA:
NVIDIA's market capitalization has grown from approximately $150 billion at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020 to over $5.0 trillion today.
The Average Joe Billionaires:
Before the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020, the average global billionaire was worth $3.82 billion. Following the massive surge in asset values and stock market recoveries, the average billionaire's net worth climbed to $5.11 billion by 2024, and reached $5.86 billion according to the Forbes global data.
Now for the math:
Elon Musk's wealth grew by 3,600%.
Peter Thiel's wealth grew by 113%.
Open AI's valuation grew by 124,900%.
NVIDIA's valuation grew by 3,200%.
The average Joe Billionaire' net worth grew by 53%.
The Covid Pandemic was very good for business.
Then there are the vaccine manufacturers:
BioNTech: Worth about seven times more than its pre-pandemic valuation, despite stock values retreating from their 2021 peak, and holds over $15 billion in cash reserves
Moderna: Saw its 5-year stock performance surge by +418% following the rollout of its COVID-19 vaccine, after raising $2 billion in pre-pandemic financing
Profits (2021–2022): Major COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers—including Pfizer, BioNTech, Moderna, and Sinovac—raked in a combined $90 billion in profits, with individual net profits hitting roughly $35 billion for Pfizer, $20 billion for BioNTech, and $20 billion for Moderna.
New Billionaires: The vaccine boom minted at least 9 new billionaires, including executives and founders like BioNTech's Uğur Şahin and Özlem Türeci and Moderna's Stéphane Bance.
Here is where the Moderna angle gets seriously suspicious.
An in depth look at Moderna shows that Between 2011 and 2017, Moderna raised US$2 billion in venture capital funding prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and before going public with its IPO in 2018 .
Its stated goal was to develop an mRNA vaccine. 4 to10 years before the Covid pandemic hit...
In January 2016, the Gates Foundation awarded Moderna an initial $20 million grant (with a potential commitment of up to $100 million) to research mRNA-based antibody combinations for preventing HIV and other infectious diseases.
The link between Moderna, CRISPR technology, Covid-19 and the Epstein files:
mRNA is used to deliver CRISPR components. Scientists package the instructions for making CRISPR-Cas9 machinery into mRNA so the gene-editing enzymes do their job briefly inside the cell and then quickly degrade without lingering.
The timeline goes like this:
1987: Yoshizumi Ishino and his team in Japan first discovered CRISPR sequences in E. coli.
2002–2005: Scientists like Francisco Mojica identified that CRISPR acts as a natural bacterial immune system.
2012: Jennifer Doudna, Emmanuelle Charpentier, and their colleagues published a landmark study showing how CRISPR-Cas9 could be reprogrammed as a precise genome-editing tool.
2013: Feng Zhang, George Church, and other researchers successfully demonstrated CRISPR-Cas9 for editing genes in human and mammalian cells.
-Side note, George Church is in the Epstein files and was a source of research for Jeffrey Epstein.
 |
| George Church is a professor of genetics at Harvard Medical School and a professor of health sciences and technology at Harvard and MIT. |
The Epstein/Church relationship.
Key Connections and Funding
- Early Funding: Church's lab received $686,000 between 2005 and 2007 from the nonprofit Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation.
- Post-Conviction Meetings: Even after Epstein's 2008 conviction for soliciting a minor, Church continued to interact with him, holding phone calls, meals, and on-campus meetings (including multiple meetings in 2014).
- Later Research Support: Between 2010 and 2015, donors introduced to Harvard researchers by Epstein provided $2 million to support Church's work.
- Personal Genome Project (PGP): Epstein participated in Church’s Personal Genome Project, and newly released records and reports revealed internal laboratory friction in 2013 over prioritizing Epstein's blood and skin biopsy samples for DNA sequencing. A PGP profile associated with Epstein also underwent a post-mortem update in early 2026.
Bill Gates and George Church affiliations is as follows:
Harvard geneticist George Church and Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates share intersections in biotechnology, synthetic biology, and high-tech scientific ventures:
- Biotech Investments & Startups: Bill Gates has backed or invested in companies tied to George Church's pioneering work in genetics and gene editing, including Editas Medicine (a CRISPR gene-editing pioneer co-founded by Church) and platforms like Ginkgo Bioworks.
OpenAI and Ginkgo Bioworks partnered to build a "lab-in-the-loop" autonomous system powered by GPT-5. This collaboration represents a major milestone in AI-driven scientific discovery, successfully transitioning generative AI from a text-based assistant into an agent capable of conducting real-world biological engineering
- Scientific Symposia & Forums: Both have spoken at major scientific forums centered on genomics, personal genomes, and the future of medicine, such as the UW Genome Sciences symposium.
- Shared Circles and Networks: Figures in the Gates ecosystem—such as Boris Nikolić (former science adviser to Bill Gates and co-founder of Biomatics Capital)—have maintained overlapping investments in George Church-linked ventures like eGenesis (focused on synthetic and xenotransplanted organs).
- Longevity and Emerging Tech: Both figures have separately engaged with or commented on cutting-edge life sciences, anti-aging research, and automated AI-driven laboratories (such as AI science and robotics initiatives).
George Church and Bill Gates have been involved with each other across several high-profile intersections spanning biotech investments, scientific conferences, and mutual professional networks.
Their notable connections occurred during the following periods:
1. Medical and Biotech Investments (2015)
- Editas Medicine: In August 2015, Bill Gates was part of a major investment group that backed Editas Medicine, a pioneer company in CRISPR gene editing. George Church is a co-founder and lead scientific advisor for the company.
- Biomatics Capital: Church’s synthetic organ startup, eGenesis, received early financial backing from Biomatics Capital—a venture firm founded and managed by former executives from the Gates Foundation and Gates Ventures.
2. Scientific Symposiums (2008)
- UW Genome Sciences: In April 2008, both men were featured as high-profile speakers at the University of Washington's Genome Sciences symposium, titled "The Personal Genome: Consequences for Society, Implications for Medicine." Gates presented alongside prominent geneticists, including Church and Eric Lander.
3. Overlapping Social Networks (2011–2014)
- The Jeffrey Epstein Connection: Both Church and Gates shared a mutual connection through late financier Jeffrey Epstein, who aggressively fundraised within their respective fields.
- Documented emails from 2014 reveal that Epstein actively tried to orchestrate a direct, private meeting between Church and Gates to discuss genetics, "anti-aging," and "genetic fabrication". Both Gates and Church have publicly expressed profound regret over their associations with Epstein
George Church was also involved with Open AI.
1. Executive Investment Connections
While George Church does not work directly for OpenAI, prominent OpenAI executives are early financial backers of Church's biotech ventures.
- Early Funding: Key OpenAI executives—including Wojciech Zaremba (Co-founder), Kevin Weil (Chief Product Officer), and Srinivas Narayanan (VP of Engineering)—joined an early $12 million funding round for a biotech venture associated with Church’s ecosystem.
- The Synergy: This reflects a growing trend where top figures in the Silicon Valley AI space are aggressively funding synthetic biology, longevity, and computational genetics startups pioneered by Church's lab.
2. Differing Philosophies: "Scientific AI" vs. OpenAI's "AGI"
George Church has been vocal about his perspective on the current AI race, drawing a sharp distinction between his work and OpenAI’s core mission of creating Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).
| Feature | George Church's Approach ("Scientific AI") | OpenAI's Approach (Language & AGI) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Goal | Solving narrow, highly complex biological spaces (e.g., protein folding, capsid spaces, DNA sequencing). | Building broad, cross-domain intelligence that matches or exceeds human capabilities (AGI/ASI). |
| Data Source | Generated through massive robotic and high-throughput empirical biological libraries. | Trained on massive datasets scraped from the internet, human language, and text. |
| Safety Outlook | Believes "Scientific AI" is highly controllable and safe because it works within strict biological constraints. | Expresses concern that intense corporate competition undermines safety, and humanity lacks the ethical consensus to handle a foreign general intelligence. |
"I'm much more excited about scientific AI than I am about language AI... What worries me is that to get to the next level of language requires AGI or ASI. And that’s very dangerous... typically when there's an intense competition, safety rules get undermined and pushed aside."
— George Church
3. Church’s AI Startups
Church applies AI as a specialized tool rather than a general-purpose oracle. He has co-founded several high-profile AI-meets-biology ventures:
- Lila Sciences: Church serves as Chief Scientist for this scientific superintelligence startup. Instead of scraping text like ChatGPT, Lila uses high-throughput automated labs to feed "physical" data directly into AI algorithms to model biology and target age-related diseases.
- Astromech: A spinout from his de-extinction company Colossal Biosciences, Astromech utilizes genomic AI models specifically to study deep animal genomics and unlock secrets to human longevity.
Renowned Harvard geneticist George Church serves as the Chief Scientist at Lila Sciences, a Cambridge-based startup founded in 2023 by Flagship Pioneering
 |
| Bill Gates at Lila Sciences' Lab |
Lila Sciences builds autonomous AI systems and robotic laboratories to accelerate scientific discovery across life sciences, chemistry, and materials science.
Relation to OpenAI
- Ecosystem Competitors & Relatives: Lila Sciences and OpenAI operate in overlapping spheres of frontier AI research applied to science and reasoning, with Lila explicitly cited as competing in the autonomous/scientific intelligence landscape alongside players like Anthropic and specialized AI labs.
- Scientific Benchmarks: OpenAI actively develops domain-specific evaluation tools for scientific reasoning—such as LifeSciBench, a benchmark created with PhD-level scientists to test how well AI models handle real-world laboratory evidence and biological data interpretation
The connection between LifeSciBench and George Church centers on his Harvard Medical School laboratory, where the founders of the project met and conceived the idea.
The Origin Story
LifeSciBench is an advanced benchmark comprising 750 expert-authored tasks used to evaluate how effectively artificial intelligence and large language models can execute practical, complex life science research.
The platform was built by researchers Gleb Kuznetsov and Pierce Ogden. Both founders crossed paths while working as researchers in the famed laboratory of George Church at Harvard Medical School. Immersed in Church's high-throughput biological engineering environment, they realized the critical need for a standardized framework to measure how well AI systems can actually assist or automate long-horizon scientific work.
Alignment with George Church's Philosophy
Though LifeSciBench is an independent tool, its core objective directly echoes Church's outspoken philosophies on the intersection of AI and biology:
- Domain-Specific Superintelligence: Church has long advocated for focusing AI development away from generalized language models and toward narrow, scientific architectures designed for biological code (like DNA sequences and protein spaces).
- Automation and Throughput: Church's lab is known for pioneering multiplex, massively parallel experimentation. LifeSciBench bridges this mindset to software, assessing whether current AI can reliably step up to handle the grueling, multi-step workflows required by modern synthetic biology labs.
Aside from the fact that we are now controlled by the un-mentioned threat on our health through the deployment of viruses and the reacting agents, in AI we have a tool that can design catastrophes in mere hours.
Imagine that kind of power in the hands of an imbecile like Trump, supported by a bunch of Republicans that would literally killed their own mothers- or wives, to remain in office.
The consequences became unavoidable the minute Jeffrey Epstein's co-conspirators got control of the WhiteHouse and Trump.
The Nancy Guthrie connection:
From her jail cell right now, Ghyslaine Maxwell is engineering the final assault on democracy- and The United States, while awaiting a Presidential pardon.
But Maxwell got wedged by the very girl she recruited years ago for sexual exploitations.
In September of 2019, roughly seven months before she was arrested, Savanah Guthrie interviewed six victims of Epstein and Maxwell. One or more of these girls were aware of scientific research conducted on behalf of Epstein and Maxwell.
Six days after the interview aired, a man called David Ivan Grazette showed up at 30 Rock in New York- the headquarter of NBC, and allegedly started pulling fire alarms. he was detained and sent to a psychiatric hospital for evaluation.
He would later sue the city of New York, Rockefeller centre and apparently a cop named Robert Mueller...
However, shortly after Ghyslaine Maxwell's arrest, Grazette began writing to her while she was incarcerated in New York. At one point eluding to a fictional story about a room with Yellow wallpaper, perhaps hinting at the invasion of a ranch near Tucson Arizona, that was the subject of a Qanon conspiracy where it was alleged that children were held in a light coloured room, for the purpose of child trafficking and sexual exploitation.
That ranch is located roughly 50 minutes from Nancy Guthrie's home.
It became an area of focus once we had identified that the ranch was bought a year before Guthrie was abducted, by an affiliate of Jeffrey Epstein and acquaintance of Ghyslaine Maxwell, Cornelia Guest.
 |
| Cornelia Guest |
 |
| Ghyslaine Maxwell and Cornelia Guest. |
Then we realized that Marc Andreessen is alleged to either have financed and/or become a reservation supplier for Ms. Guest new business, a Glam-Camp...
The "Run Down" goes like this:
From allegations I forwarded to the National Institute of Health in Washington D.C. in September of 2020, to a subsequent stack of emails I received at home through regular mail, seemingly authored by an associate of Dr. Fauci, I understood that my concerns were received by the NIH's Covid investigative Team.
Later on I would suspect that Senator Rand Paul was gunning for Dr. Fauci in an effort to silence him about, in part, the allegations I had set forth. While a greater concern loomed large on the liability The United States could face for its role in the deployment of chemicals that facilitated the gain of function of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
I offered my testimony through Senator Wyden's aide in his investigation of Epstein fund transfers that the Secretary of the Treasury, Scott Bessent, refuses to produce for the benefit of the Committee.
The Senate Committee on Finance did not decline my offer, they simply never answered...
According to financial records, products of under-cover operations in Canada pertaining to Jeffrey Epstein's investments and publicly available, open source data, I concluded that there is a more than likely suspicion that the Covid-19 pandemic was premeditated, in part, for the purpose of profiteering and to a greater extent, the development of an AI attack
In imposing on the world the deployment and weaponization of the virus, a new economic group was born, through the research and financing of Artificial Intelligence.
Today, the AI economy accounts for roughly 40% to 50% of the United States GDP.
For those wondering what the Nancy Guthrie Abduction has to do with any of this, I believe that, Ghyslaine Maxwell from her jail cell, right now, is blackmailing Trump, his benefactors and The United States.
She is one, not the only one that controls the Covid weaponization evidence, and she is concerned that some of the girls might have said something in interviews with NBC's Savanah Guthrie.
The goal is to destroy not only the American economy but the global financial system through AI and presumably, in 2028, another pandemic.
Watch this.
Comments
Post a Comment